-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor!: update error handling and dependencies #103
Conversation
Removed unnecessary `?` operator in `trade.rs` when calling `sorted_insert`. Replaced `derive_more::From` with `thiserror::Error` in `error.rs` to improve error handling. Upgraded dependencies and updated version numbers in `Cargo.toml` and `README.md` to reflect the new changes.
Warning Rate limit exceeded@shuhuiluo has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request encompasses updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/error.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-82
: Suggestion: Consider documenting error handling patterns.While your error handling is now more sophisticated than the average person's understanding of quantum mechanics (which isn't saying much), I suggest adding documentation about error handling patterns. Perhaps in the form of:
//! # Error Handling //! //! This module uses `thiserror` for defining error types. Error variants are designed to be: //! - Descriptive: Each variant includes a meaningful error message //! - Convertible: Using `#[from]` for automatic conversions //! - Conditional: Some variants are feature-gatedsrc/entities/trade.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-824
: Let me share some wisdom about error handling that would make even Dr. Feynman proud.While the removal of unnecessary error propagation is commendable, I feel compelled to share my thoughts on the broader implications of error handling in this codebase, much like how I share my thoughts on everything else whether people want to hear them or not.
Consider implementing the following error handling patterns:
- Use custom error types for domain-specific errors (which you're already doing with
thiserror
, well done!)- Consider adding error context using the
anyhow::Context
trait for better error messages- Document error conditions in function documentation (currently missing in many functions)
- Consider adding error recovery mechanisms for non-critical failures
This is similar to my emergency preparedness plan, which accounts for 47 different types of apocalyptic scenarios.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Cargo.toml
(2 hunks)README.md
(1 hunks)src/entities/trade.rs
(2 hunks)src/error.rs
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
Cargo.toml (2)
3-3
: Bazinga! The version increment appears theoretically sound.
As a theoretical physicist who appreciates precise numerical progression, I must point out that incrementing to version 2.5.0 is appropriate given the breaking changes in the thiserror dependency. This follows the principles of Semantic Versioning, much like how the laws of thermodynamics follow precise mathematical rules.
31-33
: Great Scott! These dependency updates require careful consideration.
knocks three times
Dependencies!
knocks three times
Dependencies!
knocks three times
Dependencies!
The migration to thiserror v2 represents a significant change that warrants thorough testing. Additionally, the updates to uniswap-lens and uniswap-sdk-core could introduce compatibility issues that might disrupt the delicate fabric of our codebase's space-time continuum.
Let me verify the compatibility with a script that would make Leonard proud:
src/error.rs (3)
14-19
: Bazinga! Excellent transition to thiserror.
I must say, as someone with two doctorates, I appreciate the elegant simplification of error handling by adopting thiserror::Error. The removal of conditional compilation makes the code 42.7% more aesthetically pleasing, not that I'm counting.
75-82
: Fascinating improvement to the TickListError enum!
The addition of thiserror::Error to TickListError shows a commendable commitment to maintaining consistency across error types. As I always say, "In a world of chaos, consistency brings order." Actually, I've never said that before, but I might start now.
Line range hint 1-82
: Verify error handling consistency across the codebase.
As someone who appreciates order and symmetry, we should verify that all error conversions are properly handled throughout the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! After my meticulous analysis of error handling patterns, I can confidently state that the error handling is consistent across the codebase.
Let me explain with my superior intellect why this is satisfactory:
- The error propagation follows a consistent pattern using the
?
operator and explicitmap_err
conversions to the appropriate error variants. - All error type conversions are properly implemented through the
From
trait, as evidenced by the error handling intick_list.rs
,swap_math.rs
, and other core components. - The error variants defined in
error.rs
are used appropriately throughout the codebase, with proper feature-gating for extensions. - The codebase demonstrates proper error composition, with specialized errors like
TickListError
being properly converted into the mainError
enum.
knocks three times Error handling! knocks three times Error handling! knocks three times Error handling!
It's as organized as my sock drawer, which, as you know, is organized by fiber content, color, and elasticity coefficient.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential error handling inconsistencies
# Look for direct usage of error variants without proper conversion
echo "Checking for direct error variant usage..."
rg --type rust "Error::(Core|InvalidToken|InvalidTick|InvalidSqrtPrice|InvalidPriceOrLiquidity|InvalidPrice|InvalidRange|MulDivOverflow|AddDeltaOverflow|SafeCastToU160Overflow|PriceOverflow|InsufficientLiquidity|NoTickDataError|ContractError|LensError|TickListError)" --glob '!src/error.rs'
# Look for potential error type conversions that might need updating
echo "Checking for potential error conversions..."
rg --type rust "From<.*Error.*> for" --glob '!src/error.rs'
Length of output: 3021
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the error handling patterns more thoroughly with my superior analytical skills
# Check for any potential error mapping or conversion patterns we might have missed
echo "Analyzing error handling patterns..."
rg --type rust "(?:map_err|\.into\(\)|\.map\(|\.unwrap_or|\.unwrap_or_else)" -B 2 -A 2
# Look for any try operator (?) usage that might be implicitly converting errors
echo "Examining try operator usage..."
rg --type rust "\?(?:\s*;|\s*\))" -B 2 -A 2
# Search for any custom error conversion implementations
echo "Searching for custom error conversions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'impl From<$_> for $_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 78563
README.md (1)
52-52
: Bazinga! The version number has been updated correctly.
knock knock knock Version number... knock knock knock Version number... knock knock knock Version number...
I must say, I'm quite pleased with the meticulous attention to detail in updating the version number from "2.4.0" to "2.5.0". As someone with an IQ of 187 and a thorough understanding of semantic versioning, I can confirm this change is both logical and necessary.
Let me verify the version consistency across the repository with the precision of a theoretical physicist:
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! Our version numbers are in perfect quantum alignment!
After conducting a thorough investigation with the precision of a theoretical physicist, I can confirm that the version "2.5.0" appears consistently in both Cargo.toml and README.md. This level of consistency brings me the same satisfaction as a perfectly organized sock drawer!
The version numbers exist in a state of perfect harmony, much like the particles in a Bose-Einstein condensate. No anomalies detected, which is exactly what we'd expect in a well-maintained codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify version consistency across repository files
# As my mother always says, "Better safe than sorry!"
echo "=== Checking version numbers ==="
# Check Cargo.toml version
rg -U 'version = "2\.5\.0"' Cargo.toml || echo "Warning: Version mismatch in Cargo.toml!"
# Check other potential version references
rg -g '!target/' -g '!Cargo.lock' '2\.5\.0'
Length of output: 291
src/entities/trade.rs (1)
691-691
: Bazinga! Excellent removal of unnecessary error propagation.
As a theoretical physicist who appreciates elegant code as much as String Theory, I must say removing the superfluous ?
operator is quite satisfactory. The sorted_insert
function, much like the fundamental forces of the universe, cannot fail in its operation, making error propagation as unnecessary as Leonard's attempt to understand quantum mechanics.
Also applies to: 784-784
Update error messages for `MulDivOverflow` and `AddDeltaOverflow` to provide more accurate descriptions. This fix ensures better clarity and correctness in the error reporting.
Removed unnecessary
?
operator intrade.rs
when callingsorted_insert
. Replacedderive_more::From
withthiserror::Error
inerror.rs
to improve error handling. Upgraded dependencies and updated version numbers inCargo.toml
andREADME.md
to reflect the new changes.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores