Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: refine Position::permit_batch_data and Pool::swap #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shuhuiluo
Copy link
Owner

@shuhuiluo shuhuiluo commented Dec 26, 2024

Updated Position::permit_batch_data to include enhanced type usage and improved structure alignment using U48 and other primitives. Refactored Pool::swap logic for clarity by renaming and inverting the conditional helper method to hook_impacts_swap.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced swap logic to improve clarity and error handling based on hook permissions.
    • Updated permit_batch_data method for improved type safety and clarity.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected method signatures to ensure proper functionality and parameter handling.
  • Documentation

    • Added comments to clarify the purpose of the new method related to hook permissions.

Updated `Position::permit_batch_data` to include enhanced type usage and improved structure alignment using `U48` and other primitives. Refactored `Pool::swap` logic for clarity by renaming and inverting the conditional helper method to `hook_impacts_swap`.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the Pool and Position structs in Rust. In the Pool struct, the non_impactful_hook method is renamed to hook_impacts_swap and transformed into a constant function that checks hook swap permissions. The Position struct sees changes in the permit_batch_data method, updating parameter types and improving type safety.

Changes

File Changes
src/entities/pool.rs - Renamed non_impactful_hook to hook_impacts_swap
- Changed method to constant function
- Updated swap condition logic
src/entities/position.rs - Updated permit_batch_data method signature
- Changed parameter types (slippage_tolerance, spender)
- Removed commented-out method implementation

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Hook
    participant Pool
    participant Swap
    
    Pool->>Hook: check_swap_permissions()
    alt Has Swap Permissions
        Hook-->>Pool: Allowed
        Pool->>Swap: Execute Swap
    else No Swap Permissions
        Hook-->>Pool: Denied
        Pool-->>Swap: Reject Swap
    end
Loading

Possibly Related PRs

Poem

Behold, the code's elegant dance 🕺
Where hooks and swaps now enhance 🔄
Types refined with Rust's might 💻
Permissions checked, logic tight 🔒
A refactoring symphony's delight! 🎉

Bazinga! 🤓


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29ad430 and 800fa99.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/entities/pool.rs (2 hunks)
  • src/entities/position.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/entities/position.rs (2)

1-2: Excellent import changes, my friend.
You're now using U48 for the permit logic, which is quite elegant. Implementation is logically correct and consistent.


410-447: Splendid permit assembly, dear human.
The permit_batch_data method neatly constructs AllowanceTransferPermitBatch entries using U48 for nonce and expiration. Also, referencing a &Percent ensures efficiency and avoids unnecessary clones. All looks shipshape.

src/entities/pool.rs (2)

291-291: Logical inversion, well-played.
Reworking the condition to check if !self.hook_impacts_swap() is more intuitive, preventing undesired hooks from interfering. It's consistent with your new design.


308-311: Nicely done making hook_impacts_swap const.
This ensures compile-time evaluation of hook permissions, a thrifty approach. The minimal doc block is clear. No further changes needed.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@shuhuiluo shuhuiluo merged commit 3277390 into main Dec 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@shuhuiluo shuhuiluo deleted the sync branch December 26, 2024 06:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant