Skip to content

Conversation

@dkulic
Copy link
Contributor

@dkulic dkulic commented Sep 20, 2023

The idea is to refactor SecretsResolver which provided the private key to the library, so that it does not need to hand it down. KMS will do the operations with the private key by itself.

@dkulic dkulic requested a review from yvgny September 20, 2023 07:40
@dbluhm
Copy link

dbluhm commented Sep 22, 2023

For continuity for current users of this library, there should be a provided KMS implementation that uses the old SecretsResolver interface. That way, people following the SecretsResolver model may continue to do so without needing to make more substantial changes to support a KMS approach.

@dkulic dkulic changed the title Refactor SecretsResolver to KMS WIP: Refactor SecretsResolver to KMS Sep 27, 2023
@dkulic dkulic changed the title WIP: Refactor SecretsResolver to KMS Refactor SecretsResolver to KMS Oct 11, 2023
@itsbalamurali
Copy link

@yvgny any progress on this PR review?

yvgny
yvgny previously approved these changes Jan 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants