Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - Remove deficit gossipsub scoring during topic transition #4486

Closed

Conversation

ackintosh
Copy link
Member

@ackintosh ackintosh commented Jul 9, 2023

Issue Addressed

This PR closes #3237

Proposed Changes

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

Additional Info

  • Divided NetworkService::start() into NetworkService::build() and NetworkService::start() for ease of testing.

@ackintosh ackintosh changed the title Remove topic weight from old fork topics Remove deficit gossipsub scoring during topic transition Jul 9, 2023
@ackintosh ackintosh force-pushed the remove-deficit-gossipsub-scoring branch from 4168d1b to 75ac306 Compare August 28, 2023 23:02
@ackintosh ackintosh force-pushed the remove-deficit-gossipsub-scoring branch from 9e54d24 to 1180022 Compare September 3, 2023 04:46
@ackintosh ackintosh marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2023 06:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@divagant-martian divagant-martian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of grammar corrections and a suggestion to make code a bit clearer, but otherwise I think this looks like what the original issue requested.

beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/service/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
beacon_node/lighthouse_network/src/service/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 973 to 981

#[cfg(test)]
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn get_topic_params(
&self,
topic: GossipTopic,
) -> Option<&lighthouse_network::libp2p::gossipsub::TopicScoreParams> {
self.libp2p.get_topic_params(topic)
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#[allow(dead_code)] annotations I think are generally confusing. It's not clear if this is used or not in the tests (because if yes then the #[cfg(test)] should be enough).

To better align this with where it's used, you could move it to beacon_node/network/src/service/tests.rs like this

    // use tokio::runtime::Runtime;
    // use types::{Epoch, EthSpec, ForkName, MinimalEthSpec, SubnetId};

    impl<T: beacon_chain::BeaconChainTypes> NetworkService<T> {
        fn get_topic_params(
            &self,
            topic: GossipTopic,
        ) -> Option<&lighthouse_network::libp2p::gossipsub::TopicScoreParams> {
            self.libp2p.get_topic_params(topic)
        }
    }

    // fn get_logger(actual_log: bool) -> Logger {
    // .. rest of the code

and it will not require any extra annotation

Copy link
Member

@AgeManning AgeManning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me also. Just pending @divagant-martian comments

ackintosh and others added 2 commits September 13, 2023 06:31
Co-authored-by: Divma <26765164+divagant-martian@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Divma <26765164+divagant-martian@users.noreply.github.com>
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2023
## Issue Addressed

This PR closes #3237

## Proposed Changes

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

## Additional Info

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 15, 2023

Build failed (retrying...):

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2023
## Issue Addressed

This PR closes #3237

## Proposed Changes

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

## Additional Info

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 15, 2023

Build failed:

@AgeManning
Copy link
Member

We are in the process of fixing the CI, so this should be able to merged smoother

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
## Issue Addressed

This PR closes #3237

## Proposed Changes

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

## Additional Info

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 20, 2023

Build failed (retrying...):

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2023
## Issue Addressed

This PR closes #3237

## Proposed Changes

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

## Additional Info

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 21, 2023

Build failed (retrying...):

@michaelsproul
Copy link
Member

bors r-

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 21, 2023

Canceled.

@michaelsproul michaelsproul added waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. and removed ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. labels Sep 21, 2023
@divagant-martian divagant-martian added ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. and removed waiting-on-author The reviewer has suggested changes and awaits thier implementation. labels Sep 30, 2023
@paulhauner
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2023
## Issue Addressed

This PR closes #3237

## Proposed Changes

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

## Additional Info

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into unstable.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title Remove deficit gossipsub scoring during topic transition [Merged by Bors] - Remove deficit gossipsub scoring during topic transition Oct 4, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Oct 4, 2023
Woodpile37 pushed a commit to Woodpile37/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
## Issue Addressed

This PR closes sigp#3237

## Proposed Changes

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

## Additional Info

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
Woodpile37 pushed a commit to Woodpile37/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
This PR closes sigp#3237

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
Woodpile37 pushed a commit to Woodpile37/lighthouse that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2024
This PR closes sigp#3237

Remove topic weight of old topics when the fork happens.

- Divided `NetworkService::start()` into `NetworkService::build()` and `NetworkService::start()` for ease of testing.
@ackintosh ackintosh deleted the remove-deficit-gossipsub-scoring branch May 5, 2024 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants