-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 805
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sync active request byrange ids logs #6914
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,16 +1,15 @@ | ||
use std::sync::Arc; | ||
|
||
use crate::rpc::{ | ||
methods::{ResponseTermination, RpcResponse, RpcSuccessResponse, StatusMessage}, | ||
SubstreamId, | ||
}; | ||
use libp2p::swarm::ConnectionId; | ||
use std::fmt::{Display, Formatter}; | ||
use std::sync::Arc; | ||
use types::{ | ||
BlobSidecar, DataColumnSidecar, Epoch, EthSpec, Hash256, LightClientBootstrap, | ||
LightClientFinalityUpdate, LightClientOptimisticUpdate, LightClientUpdate, SignedBeaconBlock, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
use crate::rpc::{ | ||
methods::{ResponseTermination, RpcResponse, RpcSuccessResponse, StatusMessage}, | ||
SubstreamId, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
/// Identifier of requests sent by a peer. | ||
pub type PeerRequestId = (ConnectionId, SubstreamId); | ||
|
||
|
@@ -235,9 +234,108 @@ impl slog::Value for RequestId { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// This custom impl reduces log boilerplate not printing `DataColumnsByRootRequestId` on each id log | ||
impl std::fmt::Display for DataColumnsByRootRequestId { | ||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
write!(f, "{} {:?}", self.id, self.requester) | ||
macro_rules! impl_display { | ||
($structname: ty, $format: literal, $($field:ident),*) => { | ||
impl Display for $structname { | ||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
write!(f, $format, $(self.$field,)*) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Since each request Id is deeply nested with various types, if rendered with Debug on logs they | ||
// take too much visual space. This custom Display implementations make the overall Id short while | ||
// not losing information | ||
impl_display!(BlocksByRangeRequestId, "{}/{}", id, parent_request_id); | ||
impl_display!(BlobsByRangeRequestId, "{}/{}", id, parent_request_id); | ||
impl_display!(DataColumnsByRangeRequestId, "{}/{}", id, parent_request_id); | ||
impl_display!(ComponentsByRangeRequestId, "{}/{}", id, requester); | ||
impl_display!(DataColumnsByRootRequestId, "{}/{}", id, requester); | ||
impl_display!(SingleLookupReqId, "{}/Lookup/{}", req_id, lookup_id); | ||
impl_display!(CustodyId, "{}", requester); | ||
impl_display!(SamplingId, "{}/{}", sampling_request_id, id); | ||
|
||
impl Display for DataColumnsByRootRequester { | ||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
match self { | ||
Self::Custody(id) => write!(f, "Custody/{id}"), | ||
Self::Sampling(id) => write!(f, "Sampling/{id}"), | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl Display for CustodyRequester { | ||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
write!(f, "{}", self.0) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl Display for RangeRequestId { | ||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
match self { | ||
Self::RangeSync { chain_id, batch_id } => write!(f, "RangeSync/{batch_id}/{chain_id}"), | ||
Self::BackfillSync { batch_id } => write!(f, "BackfillSync/{batch_id}"), | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl Display for SamplingRequestId { | ||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
write!(f, "{}", self.0) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl Display for SamplingRequester { | ||
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
match self { | ||
Self::ImportedBlock(block) => write!(f, "ImportedBlock/{block}"), | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[cfg(test)] | ||
mod tests { | ||
use super::*; | ||
|
||
#[test] | ||
fn display_id_data_columns_by_root_custody() { | ||
let id = DataColumnsByRootRequestId { | ||
id: 123, | ||
requester: DataColumnsByRootRequester::Custody(CustodyId { | ||
requester: CustodyRequester(SingleLookupReqId { | ||
req_id: 121, | ||
lookup_id: 101, | ||
}), | ||
}), | ||
}; | ||
assert_eq!(format!("{id}"), "123/Custody/121/Lookup/101"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[test] | ||
fn display_id_data_columns_by_root_sampling() { | ||
let id = DataColumnsByRootRequestId { | ||
id: 123, | ||
requester: DataColumnsByRootRequester::Sampling(SamplingId { | ||
id: SamplingRequester::ImportedBlock(Hash256::ZERO), | ||
sampling_request_id: SamplingRequestId(101), | ||
}), | ||
}; | ||
assert_eq!(format!("{id}"), "123/Sampling/101/ImportedBlock/0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[test] | ||
fn display_id_data_columns_by_range() { | ||
let id = DataColumnsByRangeRequestId { | ||
id: 123, | ||
parent_request_id: ComponentsByRangeRequestId { | ||
id: 122, | ||
requester: RangeRequestId::RangeSync { | ||
chain_id: 54, | ||
batch_id: Epoch::new(0), | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
}; | ||
assert_eq!(format!("{id}"), "123/122/RangeSync/0/54"); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I found having consecutive numbers make it harder to guess what they are. Would something like this be easier to understand? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. These are debug logs, only use will use this. Have you seen @AgeManning 's batch state codes? It's even harder to follow 🤣 . Remember that before we just had a number with no information at all. This IDs get logged quite a lot when sync is running I believe succinctness is good There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I disagree with this, because for anyone else to read this (even anyone from our team) we'd have to look it up in the code to know how to use this log, and I don't think adding |
||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is definitely better than before! although it may still be not as straight forward to search in an indexed log viewer, compared to other logs where we have key/values.
e.g.
This is quite hard to read without memorizing the order or looking at the code.
Also if we do want to go ahead with this format, would it make more sense to have the order the other way around? i.e. parent request id first?(actually i realise it doesn't matter coz we have requester at the end)