Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC Document standardised CMSEditLink method #557

Merged

Conversation

@@ -63,9 +64,10 @@ nesting `GridField`s. For the below examples it is assumed you aren't using nest
will handle those situations for you if you use it.

> [!TIP]
> The easiest way to implement `CMSEditLink()` is by
> The easiest way to get a correct return value for `CMSEditLink()` is by
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should use the new hook instead?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what you're asking

en/02_Developer_Guides/00_Model/13_Managing_Records.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
en/02_Developer_Guides/14_Files/07_File_Usage.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
en/08_Changelogs/6.0.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli force-pushed the pulls/6/standardise-cmseditlink branch 2 times, most recently from b8d0ae5 to fc2edec Compare August 22, 2024 03:48
Copy link
Member

@emteknetnz emteknetnz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merge conflict

@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli force-pushed the pulls/6/standardise-cmseditlink branch from fc2edec to 7a9fcd2 Compare August 25, 2024 22:07
@GuySartorelli
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased

@emteknetnz emteknetnz merged commit 3f9c554 into silverstripe:6 Aug 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@emteknetnz emteknetnz deleted the pulls/6/standardise-cmseditlink branch August 25, 2024 22:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants