Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docker: depend on ctakes 1.1.1 #310

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024
Merged

docker: depend on ctakes 1.1.1 #310

merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

mikix
Copy link
Contributor

@mikix mikix commented May 9, 2024

This hopefully fixes a race condition when restarting cTAKES as we feed it new bsv files.

Also bumped ETL's version to 1.1.1 (coincidentally the same :D)

Checklist

  • Consider if documentation (like in docs/) needs to be updated
  • Consider if tests should be added

This hopefully fixes a race condition when restarting cTAKES as we
feed it new bsv files.

Also bumped ETL's version to 1.1.1 (coincidentally the same :D)
image: smartonfhir/ctakes-covid:1.1.0
image: smartonfhir/ctakes-covid:1.1.1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is very tight pinning, I know. And maybe it should just be 1.1? But I also kind of like how paranoid it is. Open to thoughts.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'm ok in this case since its unlikely to change, and we always want to run latest.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're OK with what? 1.1 or the paranoia?

While we always want to run the latest, if there's every any change that can affect the results from cTAKES, we need to bump some task version numbers in every task that uses cTAKES.

So like, I wouldn't want to use just 1 or latest as the tag. And I went extra paranoid by also wanting to consider every patch release for possible changes. Which is maybe too much, since we are co-maintainers of that docker image and can enforce semantic versioning. But only co-maintainers...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(we need to bump task version numbers to (a) reset any existing ctakes caches you may have and (b) flag new task results so you can track which bits need to be re-run with the new NLP changes)

__version__ = "1.1.0"
__version__ = "1.1.1"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a coincidence that this lined up like this, I didn't just do a search and replace 😄

@mikix mikix merged commit 3db0c9c into main May 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@mikix mikix deleted the mikix/bump-ctakes branch May 9, 2024 14:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants