Create authenticator apigateway #8
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@italopessoa has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 1 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes encompass updates to a GitHub Actions workflow, enhancements to a Terraform configuration for AWS resources, the introduction of a new AWS SAM-based serverless application, and modifications to various helper functions and classes for user authentication and authorization. Additionally, several files have been created or updated, including Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API_Gateway
participant Lambda
participant Cognito
User->>API_Gateway: Request with CPF Header
API_Gateway->>Lambda: Invoke helloFromLambdaHandler
Lambda->>Cognito: Get User Data using CPF
Cognito-->>Lambda: Return User Data
Lambda->>API_Gateway: Return Authorization Policy
API_Gateway-->>User: Send Response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/cognitoService.js (1)
9-21: Consider adjusting logging levels for production readiness.The function logs detailed information and errors, which is beneficial for debugging but might be too verbose for production environments.
Consider adjusting the verbosity of logging based on the environment or log level settings to optimize performance and security in production.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (23)
- .github/workflows/terraform.yml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .terraform.lock.hcl (2 hunks)
- app/AuthPolicy.js (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/README.md (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/tests/unit/handlers/hello-from-lambda.test.mjs (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/buildspec.yml (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/package.json (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/samconfig.toml (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/handlers/hello-from-lambda.mjs (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/AuthPolicy.js (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/cognitoService.js (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/tokenService.js (1 hunks)
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/template.yaml (1 hunks)
- main.tf (3 hunks)
- modules/authenticator_agw/main.tf (3 hunks)
- modules/authenticator_agw/output.tf (1 hunks)
- modules/authenticator_agw/variables.tf (2 hunks)
- output.tf (2 hunks)
- providers.tf (1 hunks)
- sampleapp.yaml (1 hunks)
- variables.tf (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .gitignore
- app/cpf-policy-authorizer/.gitignore
- providers.tf
Additional context used
Biome
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/cognitoService.js
[error] 26-26: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
app/AuthPolicy.js
[error] 125-125: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/AuthPolicy.js
[error] 125-125: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/handlers/hello-from-lambda.mjs
[error] 219-219: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 150-150: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Markdownlint
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/README.md
17-17: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
18-18: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
19-19: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
20-20: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
21-21: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
22-22: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
23-23: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
24-24: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
25-25: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
26-26: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
27-27: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
35-35: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
36-36: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
37-37: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
48-48: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
49-49: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
50-50: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
51-51: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
52-52: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
78-78: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
Additional comments not posted (39)
modules/authenticator_agw/output.tf (2)
5-7: Output Definition for Execution ARNThe output
execution_arnis correctly defined and retrieves the execution ARN from theapi_gatewaymodule. This addition is well-implemented and follows Terraform best practices.The code changes are approved.
8-10: Output Definition for AuthorizerThe output
authis correctly defined and references an external API Gateway authorizer. This is a crucial addition for managing authentication and authorization processes effectively.The code changes are approved.
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/tokenService.js (1)
1-9: Secure Token Generation ImplementationThe function
generateAccessTokenuses JWT for token generation, which is a standard practice. However, it relies heavily on environment variables. Ensure that these variables are securely managed and not exposed in any logs or error messages.The code changes are approved.
Consider adding error handling for cases where environment variables might be undefined:
if (!process.env.ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET || !process.env.ACCESS_TOKEN_EXP || !process.env.ACCESS_TOKEN_ISSUER || !process.env.ACCESS_TOKEN_AUDIENCE) { throw new Error('Environment variables for token generation are not properly set.'); }variables.tf (2)
27-28: Updated Variable for NLB NameThe update to the default value of
nlb_namefrom"bmb-internal-connection"to"bmb-nlb-controller"indicates a change in naming convention or intended use. This change is clear and follows Terraform best practices.The code changes are approved.
30-33: New Variable for User Pool NameThe addition of the
user_pool_namevariable is well-defined, with a clear type, description, and default value. This variable enhances the configuration by providing clearer naming for user management.The code changes are approved.
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/samconfig.toml (1)
5-31: Review of SAM configuration fileThe
samconfig.tomlfile is well-structured and follows the standard conventions for SAM CLI configuration. Each section is clearly defined, and the parameters set are appropriate for their respective commands.
- Global Parameters: The
stack_nameis set, which is essential for identifying the stack in AWS CloudFormation.- Build Parameters: Enabling caching and parallel builds can significantly speed up the build process.
- Validate Parameters: Linting is enabled, which is good practice to catch syntax errors and misconfigurations early.
- Deploy Parameters: The settings ensure that IAM capabilities are explicitly acknowledged, changes are confirmed, and S3 bucket resolutions are handled, which are crucial for secure and predictable deployments.
- Package Parameters: Similar to deploy, resolving S3 is crucial for managing dependencies and artifacts.
- Sync and Local Start API/Lambda Parameters: These settings are useful for local development and testing, ensuring that the environment mimics production closely.
Overall, the file is correctly set up to manage the SAM application lifecycle effectively.
The configuration settings are appropriate and follow best practices for AWS SAM deployments.
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/package.json (1)
1-29: Review of package.jsonThe
package.jsonfile is well-configured for a Node.js project:
- Dependencies: The inclusion of
@aws-sdk/client-cognito-identity-providerandjsonwebtokenis appropriate for an authentication-related project. The versions specified are recent, which helps in leveraging the latest features and security patches.- DevDependencies: Jest is configured for testing, which is a popular choice for Node.js applications.
- Scripts: The test script uses experimental VM modules, which might be necessary for certain features in Jest but should be noted for compatibility issues with different Node.js versions.
- Jest Configuration: The test patterns and module file extensions are set up to correctly identify and run tests in various JavaScript and MJS files.
Overall, the configuration supports development, testing, and deployment practices effectively.
The dependencies, scripts, and testing configurations are appropriate and follow best practices for a Node.js project.
modules/authenticator_agw/variables.tf (5)
21-24: Updated variable:api_name.The addition of a description and a default value enhances the usability and documentation of this variable. Good improvement!
27-30: New variable addition:vpc_name.The addition of a description and a default value is a good practice, ensuring that the variable's purpose and usage are clear.
33-36: Updated variable:profile.The addition of a description and a default value improves the clarity and usability of this variable. Well done!
39-42: Updated variable:region.The addition of a description and a default value for this variable is a positive change, enhancing clarity and usability.
50-53: New variable addition:user_pool_name.The addition of a description and a default value is commendable, ensuring that the variable's purpose and usage are clear.
output.tf (4)
9-11: New output addition:api.This output is correctly defined and provides the API address. The description and value are appropriately set.
18-18: Updated output:vpc.The change in the value source from
data.aws_vpc.vpc_sample.idtodata.aws_vpc.bmb_vpc.idis noted. Ensure thatbmb_vpcis correctly configured and exists in the AWS environment.Verification successful
bmb_vpcis correctly configured in the Terraform files.The
bmb_vpcis defined and used inmain.tf, confirming its configuration and usage in the AWS environment. The change in the value source todata.aws_vpc.bmb_vpc.idis consistent with the existing setup.
main.tf: Contains the definition and usage ofbmb_vpc.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `bmb_vpc` is configured in the AWS environment. # Test: Search for `bmb_vpc` in the Terraform configuration files. Expect: Configuration details for `bmb_vpc`. rg --type tf 'bmb_vpc'Length of output: 266
37-37: New output addition:file.This output directly references the
lambda_ziparchive file data. Ensure that this reference is correctly configured and the file data is accessible.Verification successful
Configuration and Accessibility Verified:
lambda_zipArchive File DataThe
lambda_ziparchive file data is correctly configured and accessible. It is defined as adata "archive_file"block inmain.tfand appropriately referenced inoutput.tf. No issues found with its configuration.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the configuration and accessibility of the `lambda_zip` archive file data. # Test: Search for `lambda_zip` in the Terraform configuration files. Expect: Configuration details and accessibility of `lambda_zip`. rg --type tf 'lambda_zip'Length of output: 262
33-34: New output addition:path.This output constructs a path string combining the current working directory with the ID of the
lambda_ziparchive file. Ensure the path construction is valid and thelambda_ziparchive file exists.Verification successful
Path construction and
lambda_zipconfiguration are valid.The
data.archive_file.lambda_zipis correctly configured inmain.tf, and the path construction inoutput.tfis valid. Thelambda_ziparchive file is set to be created from the specified source directory. No issues found.
main.tf: Configuration ofdata.archive_file.lambda_zipis correct.output.tf: Path construction is valid.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the path construction and existence of `lambda_zip` archive file. # Test: Search for `lambda_zip` in the Terraform configuration files. Expect: Configuration details for `lambda_zip`. rg --type tf 'lambda_zip'Length of output: 262
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the configuration of `data.archive_file.lambda_zip` in `main.tf`. # Extract the configuration details of `data.archive_file.lambda_zip`. rg --type tf -A 5 'data "archive_file" "lambda_zip"' main.tfLength of output: 286
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/template.yaml (1)
21-34: Lambda function configuration appears appropriate and well-documented.The configuration for
helloFromLambdaFunctionis standard and includes necessary permissions and settings. The comments in the template are helpful for understanding the structure and purpose of each section.The configuration and documentation in this template are well-done and meet typical best practices for AWS SAM.
sampleapp.yaml (1)
1-22: Review Kubernetes Service ConfigurationThe service configuration is mostly straightforward but includes several commented-out annotations. These might be placeholders for future configurations or alternative setups. It's important to either implement these or remove them if they are not planned to be used to avoid confusion.
Annotations: The active annotation
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-nameis set correctly. However, consider whether the commented-out annotations likeservice.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type: externalare necessary for future configurations. If they are, it might be helpful to document their use cases or conditions under which they should be uncommented.Ports and Selector: The configuration for ports and selector looks correct. The service is set to use TCP protocol on port 80, targeting port 8080 on the nodes, which is standard for HTTP traffic.
The current active configuration is approved, but consider cleaning up or documenting the commented-out parts for clarity.
main.tf (2)
Line range hint
10-25: Review AWS VPC and Subnets ConfigurationThe configuration for the VPC and subnets has been updated to reference the newly renamed VPC resource
bmb_vpc. This change is correctly reflected in the subnet configuration.
- Filters: The use of tags to filter resources is a good practice as it ensures that the Terraform scripts are idempotent and only affect the intended resources. Ensure that the tags like
Terraformandkubernetes.io/role/internal-elbare consistently used across your infrastructure for clarity and maintainability.The changes to the VPC and subnets configuration are approved as they follow best practices and are correctly implemented.
49-98: Review AWS Cognito and Lambda ConfigurationThe introduction of the AWS Cognito user pools and the configuration of the Lambda function for authentication are significant enhancements.
Cognito Configuration: The use of the
namefilter to select the user pool is straightforward. Ensure that the user pool name is unique and descriptive enough to avoid confusion with other resources.Lambda Configuration: The Lambda function is configured to use a pre-existing package, which is a good practice for reducing deployment times and potential errors during packaging. The policy attached to the Lambda function allows specific Cognito actions, which should be reviewed to ensure they are the minimum necessary for functionality to adhere to the principle of least privilege.
The configurations for AWS Cognito and Lambda are approved with a suggestion to review the IAM policies for security best practices.
modules/authenticator_agw/main.tf (1)
48-107: Review API Gateway ConfigurationThe configuration of the API Gateway includes a new authorizer and updated routes, which are significant enhancements.
Authorizer Configuration: The new authorizer
cpf-authis configured to use request-based authorization, which is appropriate for scenarios requiring fine-grained access control. The use of theAuthorizationheader as an identity source is standard practice. However, ensure that the URI for the Lambda function is secure and that the Lambda function is designed to handle potential security threats.Routes Configuration: The new route
/api/{proxy+}and the updated route/swagger/{proxy+}are configured to use HTTP_PROXY integration, which simplifies the setup but requires careful security considerations, especially regarding the handling of access tokens and response mappings.The API Gateway configuration is approved with suggestions to ensure the security of the Lambda function and careful management of access tokens.
.terraform.lock.hcl (6)
4-20: Provider configuration forhashicorp/archiveapproved.The addition of the
hashicorp/archiveprovider with version2.5.0and associated hashes is correctly implemented.
46-64: Provider configuration forhashicorp/externalapproved.The addition of the
hashicorp/externalprovider with version2.3.3and constraints>= 1.0.0is correctly implemented along with the associated hashes.
66-84: Provider configuration forhashicorp/localapproved.The addition of the
hashicorp/localprovider with version2.5.1and constraints>= 1.0.0is correctly implemented along with the associated hashes.
86-104: Provider configuration forhashicorp/nullapproved.The addition of the
hashicorp/nullprovider with version3.2.2and constraints>= 2.0.0is correctly implemented along with the associated hashes.
106-123: Provider configuration forhashicorp/randomapproved.The addition of the
hashicorp/randomprovider with version3.6.2is correctly implemented along with the associated hashes.
22-25: Updated constraints forhashicorp/awsprovider approved.The updated version constraints and the addition of new hashes for the
hashicorp/awsprovider enhance flexibility and security.Run the following script to verify the integrity of the hashes:
Verification successful
Integrity of
hashicorp/awsprovider hashes verified.The hashes for the
hashicorp/awsprovider in the.terraform.lock.hclfile are correctly specified, ensuring the integrity and authenticity of the provider version. No issues were found with the hashes.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integrity of the hashes for the `hashicorp/aws` provider. # Test: Search for reported issues with the hashes. Expect: No issues found. rg --type hcl -A 5 $'hashicorp/aws'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integrity of the hashes for the `hashicorp/aws` provider. # Search for the provider block for `hashicorp/aws` in the `.terraform.lock.hcl` file. rg 'provider "registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/aws"' -A 10 .terraform.lock.hclLength of output: 732
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/helpers/AuthPolicy.js (9)
158-175: Method implementation is correct.The
getEmptyStatementmethod correctly creates an empty policy statement with the necessary properties.
177-211: Efficient handling of policy statements.The
getStatementsForEffectmethod efficiently processes methods and generates corresponding policy statements, ensuring proper policy structure.
213-223: Simplifies policy creation for allowing all methods.The
allowAllMethodsmethod correctly adds a wildcard allow statement, simplifying the policy creation process when all methods need to be allowed.
225-232: Effectively handles denying all methods.The
denyAllMethodsmethod efficiently adds a wildcard deny statement, facilitating the policy creation process when all methods need to be denied.
234-246: Correct implementation for adding allowed methods.The
allowMethodfunction correctly adds a specified method to the list of allowed methods in the policy, ensuring proper authorization handling.
248-260: Properly configured for adding denied methods.The
denyMethodfunction effectively adds a specified method to the list of denied methods in the policy, aiding in secure access control.
262-276: Effectively adds conditional allow statements.The
allowMethodWithConditionsmethod correctly handles the addition of conditions to allow statements, enhancing the flexibility and security of the policy.
278-292: Proper implementation for conditional deny statements.The
denyMethodWithConditionsmethod effectively adds conditions to deny statements, providing enhanced control over access restrictions.
294-321: Well-implemented policy document generation.The
buildmethod effectively aggregates all policy statements and constructs the final policy document, ensuring that the policy is correctly formatted and complete.app/cpf-policy-authorizer/README.md (1)
1-140: Comprehensive and well-structured README:The README file is well-organized and provides a thorough overview of the project, its structure, and deployment instructions. It effectively guides the user through setting up, deploying, and managing the application.
The content and structure of the README are approved.
Tools
Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
18-18: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
19-19: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
20-20: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
21-21: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
22-22: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
23-23: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
24-24: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
25-25: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
26-26: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
27-27: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
35-35: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
36-36: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
37-37: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
48-48: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
49-49: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
50-50: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
51-51: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
52-52: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
78-78: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
app/AuthPolicy.js (1)
1-324: Well-implemented authorization policy class:The
AuthPolicyclass is well-implemented, providing clear methods for managing API Gateway authorization policies. The class structure is logical and facilitates easy extension or modification.The implementation and structure of the
AuthPolicyclass are approved.Tools
Biome
[error] 125-125: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 56-56: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
app/cpf-policy-authorizer/src/handlers/hello-from-lambda.mjs (1)
1-417: Effective Lambda handler implementation:The Lambda handlers are effectively implemented, handling authentication and authorization logic seamlessly. The integration with AWS services is well-executed, providing robust functionality for the application.
The functionality and integration of the Lambda handlers are approved.
Tools
Biome
[error] 219-219: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 150-150: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
| version: 0.2 | ||
|
|
||
| phases: | ||
| install: | ||
| commands: | ||
| # Install all dependencies (including dependencies for running tests) | ||
| - npm install | ||
| pre_build: | ||
| commands: | ||
| # Discover and run unit tests in the '__tests__' directory | ||
| - npm run test | ||
| # Remove all unit tests to reduce the size of the package that will be ultimately uploaded to Lambda | ||
| - rm -rf ./__tests__ | ||
| # Remove all dependencies not needed for the Lambda deployment package (the packages from devDependencies in package.json) | ||
| - npm prune --production | ||
| build: | ||
| commands: | ||
| # Use AWS SAM to package the application by using AWS CloudFormation | ||
| - aws cloudformation package --template template.yaml --s3-bucket $S3_BUCKET --output-template template-export.yml | ||
| artifacts: | ||
| type: zip | ||
| files: | ||
| - template-export.yml | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of buildspec.yml
The buildspec.yml file is structured to automate the build and deployment process effectively:
- Install Phase: Properly installs all dependencies, which is crucial for a successful build and test run.
- Pre-build Phase: Runs tests and then cleans up by removing test files and pruning development-only dependencies. While this reduces the deployment package size, it might limit the ability to debug the application post-deployment. Consider keeping the tests in a separate environment or include source maps for better traceability.
- Build Phase: Uses AWS SAM and CloudFormation for packaging, which is standard and recommended for AWS deployments.
Overall, the file sets up a robust pipeline for continuous integration and deployment but could improve in maintaining artifacts useful for debugging.
The build and deployment configurations are effective and follow AWS best practices.
Consider strategies for better traceability and debugging in production environments, such as retaining source maps or separate test environments.
| @@ -14,10 +10,45 @@ variable "nlb_listener_arn" { | |||
| type = string | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| variable "profile" { | |||
| variable "authenticator_lambda_arn" { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
New variable addition: authenticator_lambda_arn.
This variable is correctly defined with the appropriate type. However, consider adding a description to enhance clarity and maintainability.
| type = string | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| variable "region" { | ||
| variable "authenticator_lambda_name" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
New variable addition: authenticator_lambda_name.
This variable is correctly defined with the appropriate type. Similar to authenticator_lambda_arn, adding a description would improve clarity and maintainability.
| variable "nlb_name" { | ||
| type = string | ||
| default = "bmb-nlb-controller" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
New variable addition: nlb_name.
This variable is defined with a type and a default value. Consider adding a description to improve clarity and maintainability.
| // Import helloFromLambdaHandler function from hello-from-lambda.mjs | ||
| import { helloFromLambdaHandler } from '../../../src/handlers/hello-from-lambda.mjs'; | ||
|
|
||
| // This includes all tests for helloFromLambdaHandler() | ||
| describe('Test for hello-from-lambda', function () { | ||
| // This test invokes helloFromLambdaHandler() and compare the result | ||
| it('Verifies successful response', async () => { | ||
| // Invoke helloFromLambdaHandler() | ||
| const result = await helloFromLambdaHandler(); | ||
| /* | ||
| The expected result should match the return from your Lambda function. | ||
| e.g. | ||
| if you change from `const message = 'Hello from Lambda!';` to `const message = 'Hello World!';` in hello-from-lambda.mjs | ||
| you should change the following line to `const expectedResult = 'Hello World!';` | ||
| */ | ||
| const expectedResult = 'Hello from Lambda!'; | ||
| // Compare the result with the expected result | ||
| expect(result).toEqual(expectedResult); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
New test file addition: hello-from-lambda.test.mjs.
The test file is well-structured and includes a test case for verifying the successful response from the helloFromLambdaHandler function. The comments are helpful, guiding future modifications to align with changes in the function's output. Ensure that additional test cases covering error handling and edge cases are added to fully validate the function's behavior.
Would you like me to help by adding more test cases or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
| * [CLion](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [GoLand](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [IntelliJ](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [WebStorm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [Rider](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [PhpStorm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [PyCharm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [RubyMine](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [DataGrip](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [VS Code](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-vscode/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | ||
| * [Visual Studio](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-visual-studio/latest/user-guide/welcome.html) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consistency in list markers:
The list items throughout the document should consistently use the same marker type. The markdown linter has flagged the use of asterisks instead of dashes.
Consider standardizing on a single list marker type (preferably dashes) to maintain consistency and adhere to markdown best practices. Here's the suggested change for one section:
- * [CLion](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html)
- * [GoLand](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html)
- * [IntelliJ](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html)
+ - [CLion](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html)
+ - [GoLand](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html)
+ - [IntelliJ](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html)Apply this change throughout the document for all list items.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| * [CLion](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [GoLand](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [IntelliJ](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [WebStorm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [Rider](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [PhpStorm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [PyCharm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [RubyMine](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [DataGrip](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [VS Code](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-vscode/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| * [Visual Studio](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-visual-studio/latest/user-guide/welcome.html) | |
| - [CLion](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [GoLand](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [IntelliJ](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [WebStorm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [Rider](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [PhpStorm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [PyCharm](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [RubyMine](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [DataGrip](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-jetbrains/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [VS Code](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-vscode/latest/userguide/welcome.html) | |
| - [Visual Studio](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/toolkit-for-visual-studio/latest/user-guide/welcome.html) |
Tools
Markdownlint
17-17: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
18-18: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
19-19: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
20-20: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
21-21: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
22-22: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
23-23: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
24-24: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
25-25: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
26-26: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
27-27: Expected: dash; Actual: asterisk
Unordered list style(MD004, ul-style)
| * @type {RegExp} | ||
| * @default '^\/[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$' | ||
| */ | ||
| this.pathRegex = new RegExp('^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize regular expression usage:
Use regular expression literals instead of the RegExp constructor.
Change the RegExp constructor to a literal for better performance and readability:
- this.pathRegex = new RegExp('^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$');
+ this.pathRegex = /^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$/;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.pathRegex = new RegExp('^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$'); | |
| this.pathRegex = /^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$/; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 56-56: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
| * @return {void} | ||
| */ | ||
| var addMethod = function (effect, verb, resource, conditions) { | ||
| if (verb != "*" && !AuthPolicy.HttpVerb.hasOwnProperty(verb)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use modern JavaScript practices:
Replace deprecated hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn.
Update the method to use modern and safer JavaScript practices:
- if (verb != "*" && !AuthPolicy.HttpVerb.hasOwnProperty(verb)) {
+ if (verb != "*" && !Object.hasOwn(AuthPolicy.HttpVerb, verb)) {
throw new Error("Invalid HTTP verb " + verb + ". Allowed verbs in AuthPolicy.HttpVerb");
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (verb != "*" && !AuthPolicy.HttpVerb.hasOwnProperty(verb)) { | |
| if (verb != "*" && !Object.hasOwn(AuthPolicy.HttpVerb, verb)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid HTTP verb " + verb + ". Allowed verbs in AuthPolicy.HttpVerb"); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 125-125: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
| * @type {RegExp} | ||
| * @default '^\/[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$' | ||
| */ | ||
| this.pathRegex = new RegExp('^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Optimize regular expression usage:
Use regular expression literals instead of the RegExp constructor.
Change the RegExp constructor to a literal for better performance and readability:
- this.pathRegex = new RegExp('^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$');
+ this.pathRegex = /^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$/;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.pathRegex = new RegExp('^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$'); | |
| this.pathRegex = /^[/.a-zA-Z0-9-\*]+$/; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 150-150: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
| * @return {void} | ||
| */ | ||
| var addMethod = function (effect, verb, resource, conditions) { | ||
| if (verb != "*" && !AuthPolicy.HttpVerb.hasOwnProperty(verb)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use modern JavaScript practices:
Replace deprecated hasOwnProperty with Object.hasOwn.
Update the method to use modern and safer JavaScript practices:
- if (verb != "*" && !AuthPolicy.HttpVerb.hasOwnProperty(verb)) {
+ if (verb != "*" && !Object.hasOwn(AuthPolicy.HttpVerb, verb)) {
throw new Error("Invalid HTTP verb " + verb + ". Allowed verbs in AuthPolicy.HttpVerb");
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (verb != "*" && !AuthPolicy.HttpVerb.hasOwnProperty(verb)) { | |
| if (verb != "*" && !Object.hasOwn(AuthPolicy.HttpVerb, verb)) { | |
| throw new Error("Invalid HTTP verb " + verb + ". Allowed verbs in AuthPolicy.HttpVerb"); | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 219-219: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| metadata: | ||
| labels: | ||
| app: nginx | ||
| spec: |
Check warning
Code scanning / SonarCloud
Service account permissions should be restricted Medium
| app: nginx | ||
| spec: | ||
| containers: | ||
| - name: sampleapi-container |
Check warning
Code scanning / SonarCloud
Memory limits should be enforced Medium
| app: nginx | ||
| spec: | ||
| containers: | ||
| - name: sampleapi-container |
Check warning
Code scanning / SonarCloud
Storage limits should be enforced Medium
|
Terraform Cloud Plan Output |
No description provided.