Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @kubrickcode, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the system's capability by adding comprehensive support for parsing Go test files. It introduces a dedicated strategy that leverages Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a parser for Go test files, which is a valuable addition. The implementation is well-structured and includes a comprehensive set of tests. My review focuses on a few areas for improvement: enhancing test performance by enabling parallel execution, ensuring associated tests are updated to reflect changes, and refactoring a function to align better with the style guide's preference for pure functions. Overall, this is a solid contribution.
b1fa60f to
94dbcce
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a parser for Go test files, which is a great addition. The implementation uses tree-sitter and correctly identifies test functions and subtests. The code is well-structured and includes a comprehensive test suite.
I've identified a correctness issue in the validation of test function parameters and a potential improvement for handling string literals. I've also suggested an additional test case to cover the parameter validation logic. Overall, this is a solid contribution.
94dbcce to
11e1969
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new parser for Go test files using the go-testing strategy. The implementation leverages tree-sitter to accurately parse *_test.go files, extracting both top-level TestXxx functions and t.Run subtests into a flat structure. The changes also include integrating Go language support into the core tree-sitter parser setup, along with a comprehensive suite of unit tests that cover numerous edge cases and ensure the parser's correctness.
The code is well-structured, adheres to the repository's Go coding conventions, and the refactoring in treesitter.go improves maintainability. I have one suggestion to optimize a loop in the parameter validation logic for better memory efficiency.
Add gotesting strategy for parsing Go test files (*_test.go) - Extract func TestXxx(t *testing.T) format test functions - Extract t.Run() subtests (flat structure) - Integrate tree-sitter Go language support fix #7
11e1969 to
3e147a5
Compare
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Add gotesting strategy for parsing Go test files (*_test.go)
fix #7