-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: add "Architecture and Load Balancers" #2574
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
e42706b
4a658b5
1365167
fe12c49
de3483c
2c28181
1c06948
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ | ||
# Architectural Considerations | ||
|
||
Building a syslog ingestion architecture is complex and requires careful planning. The syslog protocol prioritizes speed and efficiency, often at the expense of resiliency and reliability. Due to these trade-offs, traditional scaling methods may not be directly applicable to syslog. | ||
|
||
This document outlines recommended architectural solutions, along with alternative or unsupported methods that some users have found viable. | ||
|
||
## Edge vs. Centralized Collection | ||
|
||
While TCP and TLS are supported, UDP remains the dominant protocol for syslog transport in many data centers. Since syslog is a "send and forget" protocol, it performs poorly when routed through complex network infrastructures, including front-end load balancers and WAN. | ||
|
||
The most reliable way to gather syslog traffic is through edge collection rather than centralized collection. When the syslog server is centrally located, UDP and stateless TCP traffic cannot adapt, leading to potential data loss. | ||
|
||
For optimal reliability, deploy SC4S instances in the same VLAN as the source devices. | ||
|
||
## Avoid Load Balancing for Syslog | ||
|
||
For optimal performance, scale vertically by fine-tuning a single, robust server. Key tools and methods for enhancing performance on your SC4S server are documented in: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Scale vertically by fine-tuning a single, robust server. Tools and methods for enhancing performance on your SC4S server are documented in: |
||
|
||
1. [Fine-tune for TCP](tcp-optimization.md) | ||
2. [Fine-tune for UDP](udp-optimization.md) | ||
|
||
We advise against co-locating syslog-ng servers for horizontal scaling with load balancers. The challenges of load balancing for horizontal scaling are outlined in the [Load Balancer's Overview](lb/index.md) section. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Avoid co-locating syslog-ng servers for horizontal scaling with load balancers. Load balancing challenges for horizontal scaling are described in the Load Balancer's Overview section. |
||
|
||
## High Availability (HA) Considerations | ||
|
||
Syslog, being prone to data loss, can only achieve "mostly available" data collection. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Syslog is prone to data loss and can only achieve "mostly available" data collection. |
||
|
||
### HA Without Load Balancers | ||
|
||
Load balancing does not suit syslog’s stateless, unacknowledged traffic. More data is preserved with simpler designs, such as vMotioned VMs. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Load balancing does not work well with syslog’s stateless, unacknowledged traffic. To preserve more data by using simpler designs, such as vMotioned VMs. |
||
|
||
The optimal deployment model for high availability uses a [Microk8s](https://microk8s.io/) setup with MetalLB in BGP mode. This method implements load balancing through destination network translation, providing better HA results. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The best deployment model for high availability traffic is a Microk8s setup with MetalLB in BGP mode. This implements load balancing through destination network translation, providing better HA results. |
||
|
||
## UDP vs. TCP | ||
|
||
Syslog optimally uses UDP for log forwarding due to its low overhead and simplicity. UDP's streaming nature eliminates the need for network session establishment, which reduces network strain and avoids complex verification processes. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Syslog uses UDP for log forwarding due to its low overhead and simplicity. UDP's streaming nature eliminates the need for network session establishment, which reduces network strain and avoids complex verification processes. |
||
|
||
### Drawbacks of TCP | ||
|
||
While TCP uses acknowledgement signals (ACKS) to mitigate data loss, issues still arise, such as: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. TCP uses acknowledgement signals (ACKS) to mitigate data loss. Issues may still arise, including: |
||
|
||
- Loss of events during TCP session establishment | ||
- Slow acknowledgment signals leading to buffer overflows | ||
- Lost acknowledgments causing closed connections | ||
- Data loss during server restarts | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
### When to Use UDP vs. TCP | ||
|
||
SC4S supports syslog ingestion via UDP, TCP/TLS, or a combination of both, leaving the choice to the system administrator. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. SC4S supports syslog ingestion via UDP, TCP/TLS, or a combination of both. |
||
|
||
While UDP can be used by default for syslog forwarding, it’s not mandatory. TCP is often preferable for larger syslog events that exceed UDP packet limits, such as those from Web Proxy, DLP, or IDS sources. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You can use UDP by default for syslog forwarding, but TCP is often preferable for larger syslog events that exceed UDP packet limits, such as those from Web Proxy, DLP, or IDS sources. |
||
|
||
The following resources can help you determine the best protocol for your setup: | ||
|
||
1. [Run performance tests for TCP](performance-tests.md#check-your-tcp-performance) | ||
2. [Run performance tests for UDP](performance-tests.md#check-your-udp-performance) |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
# Load Balancers Are Not a Best Practice for SC4S | ||
Be aware of the following issues that may arise from load balancing syslog traffic: | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The following issues may arise from load balancing syslog traffic: |
||
|
||
- Load balancing for scale can lead to increased data loss due to normal device operations and buffer overflows. | ||
- Front-side load balancing often results in uneven data distribution on the upstream side. | ||
- The default behavior of many load balancers is to overwrite the client's source IP with their own. Preserving the real source IP requires additional configuration. | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
### Recommendations for Using Load Balancers: | ||
- Preserve the actual source IP of the sending device. | ||
- Avoid using load balancers without High Availability (HA) mode. | ||
- TCP/TLS load balancers often do not account for the load on individual connections and may favor one instance over others. Ensure all members in a resource pool are vertically scaled to handle the full workload. | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Best practices when using load balancers:
|
||
For **TCP**, you can use either a DNAT configuration or SNAT with the "PROXY" protocol enabled by setting `SC4S_SOURCE_PROXYCONNECT=yes`. | ||
For **UDP**, traffic can only pass through a load balancer using DNAT. | ||
|
||
This section of the documentation discusses various load balancing solutions and example configurations, along with known issues. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This section of the documentation discusses various load balancing solutions and example configurations, as well as known issues. |
||
|
||
Please note that load balancing syslog traffic in front of SC4S is not supported by Splunk, and additional support from the load balancer vendor may be required. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Deploy SC4S instances in the same VLAN as the source devices.