Skip to content

Conversation

@jorisv
Copy link
Contributor

@jorisv jorisv commented Nov 21, 2025

Description

Fix Doxygen document hierarchy.
Doxygen side panel should be less messy.

Checklist

  • I have run pre-commit run --all-files or pixi run lint
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code where necessary
  • I have made corresponding changes to the doxygen documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix or feature works
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG or added the "no changelog" label if it's a CI-related issue
  • I have updated the README credits section

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋 Hi,
This is a reminder message to assign an extra build label to this Pull Request if needed.
By default, this PR will be build with minimal build options (URDF support and Python bindings)
The possible extra labels are:

  • build_collision (build Pinocchio with coal support)
  • build_casadi (build Pinocchio with CasADi support)
  • build_autodiff (build Pinocchio with CppAD support)
  • build_codegen (build Pinocchio with CppADCodeGen support)
  • build_extra (build Pinocchio with extra algorithms)
  • build_mpfr (build Pinocchio with Boost.Multiprecision support)
  • build_sdf (build Pinocchio with SDF parser)
  • build_accelerate (build Pinocchio with APPLE Accelerate framework support)
  • build_all (build Pinocchio with ALL the options stated above)

Thanks.
The Pinocchio development team.

@jorisv jorisv force-pushed the topic/fix-doc-hierarchy branch from aebf50a to 166fd95 Compare November 24, 2025 12:36
@jorisv jorisv merged commit 5c50e66 into stack-of-tasks:devel Nov 24, 2025
8 checks passed
@jorisv jorisv deleted the topic/fix-doc-hierarchy branch November 24, 2025 15:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants