Statuscake: Implement Equals function using TestTags #610
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It is mentioned in a comment in the code itself but because of the discrepency between the fields in the EndpointMonitor CR and the Statuscake API it is not immediately clear how to compare an old monitor with an updated monitor. The way I have elected to check this is to use the TestTags field to include some kind of identifier that should be updated on any change. So if the tags have changed then the monitor should be updated.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR implements the
Equalsfunction in the statuscake operator. This ensures that the operator does not update all uptime checks during every round. Which could cause ratelimiting from Statuscake. My consideration for this implementation can be found below.It is mentioned in a comment in the code itself but because of the discrepency between the fields in the EndpointMonitor CR and the Statuscake API it is not immediately clear how to compare an old monitor with an updated monitor. The way I have elected to check this is to use the TestTags field to include some kind of identifier that should be updated on any change. So if the tags have changed then the monitor should be updated.I have added a comment in code to explain the reason for the implementation. Let me know if you have any other questions.