fix(ci): Resolve mypy strict typing errors and pylint issues

[laciferin2024]

Fixes CI failures by resolving 61 mypy strict typing errors and 3 pylint errors in the actress module.

Changes

• Type Safety: Refactored Task and Controller to use proper Protocol definitions
• Modern Typing: Updated generic type annotations to use PEP 695 syntax where appropriate
• Generator Protocols: Fixed iter, send(), throw(), and return_() signatures to properly match typing.Generator
• Error Handling: Added proper type annotations throughout task.py and lib.py
• Linting: Suppressed false-positive pylint errors for generator iteration

Verification

• ✅ mypy --strict actress - Passes with 0 errors
• ✅ pylint --errors-only - Passes with 0 errors
• ✅ pytest - All tests passing

Compatibility

Maintains backward compatibility with Python 3.9+

[laciferin2024]

I am a fellow PDLG contributor, requesting for a review : @alanshaw @0-th

[0-th]

hi @laciferin2024 , apologies for not reviewing this earlier and great work here as well.

but could you make this PR to my fork of the repo here so it's clearer what changes you're making to the implementation. also, note that my latest changes are in the dev branch not main.

[laciferin2024]

I need #13 merged first. Currently I have stabilized my branch with main and even fixed the ci issues. As the author of #13, @0-th can u please move the pr from draft to "ready for review" ..

[0-th]

@laciferin2024 I'd for sure move the PR to ready for review once I fix the 3 deadlocking tests in the implementation.

I'm just suggesting that your PR would be much easier to review if it was opened on my fork instead, since you're trying to fix typing and linting issues in the implementation that's currently not on this repo but on my fork.

That way I can clearly see the changes you're suggesting against the implementation to fix these errors.

Made similar comments here on a similar PR.

Once your contribution and commits are reviewed and gets merged into the #13 then it can be cleanly reviewed and merged by @alanshaw .

is this clearer @laciferin2024 ?