-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make stratis-legacy-pool a command of stratisd-tools #3752
Make stratis-legacy-pool a command of stratisd-tools #3752
Conversation
b6c3796
to
b0eb73a
Compare
If the possible values exist, they will appear in the usage message if the user enters a wrong executable value. To make them not appear at all there should be no list of possible values. A subsequent expression will verify that the name entered is a valid one. Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
b0eb73a
to
82a7fca
Compare
6b75322
to
761bb69
Compare
Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾 You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:
Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment. |
2 similar comments
Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾 You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:
Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment. |
Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾 You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:
Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment. |
761bb69
to
4319609
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you also update the git hooks accordingly?
Cargo.toml
Outdated
min = ["dep:termios"] | ||
systemd_compat = ["dep:bindgen"] | ||
udev_scripts = ["dep:data-encoding"] | ||
test_extras = ["engine"] | ||
test_extras = [] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we leaving this for packaging?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The one good reason for leaving this in was not having to update the spec file. So, yes, it was for packaging convenience. If we change it, we change the spec file. But that is no big deal, really, except that it could break the Packit/TMT structure briefly. But, we can work around that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I don't even think it was for packaging. I'll see about removing it.
Packages worked. Tests would have failed anyway, because of necessity to respond yes. |
3a546b8
to
ddb62e5
Compare
@jbaublitz This is ready again. |
Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
It is possible to use the extras feature only, since it the test_extras code is always going to be included with the extras code. Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
ddb62e5
to
cddb8d1
Compare
No description provided.