Artifact Archive Listing Implementation#1760
Artifact Archive Listing Implementation#1760anki2189 wants to merge 19 commits intostrongbox:issues/1649from
Conversation
| void setDownloadCount(Integer downloadCount); | ||
|
|
||
| ArtifactArchiveListing getArtifactArchiveListing(); | ||
| Set<ArtifactArchiveListing> getArtifactArchiveListings(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anki2189 we don't need ArtifactArchiveListing in Artifact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should have Artifact reference from ArtifactArchiveListing instead.
|
|
||
| @Inject | ||
| GenericArtifactCoordinatesAdapter genericArtifactCoordinatesAdapter; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anki2189 could you not add empty lines here and always.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@sbespalov I am using the formatter available on strongbox-documentation page and these lines are getting generated by it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@carlspring do we need this empty lines in formatter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, having an empty line between fields is how the majority of the code currently looks like, so I would prefer that we follow this convention.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@carlspring will it be possible to review this rule? these empty lines don't bring any sense but from the other side its absence means a lot on my 13 inch laptop :)
| .has("uuid", uuid) | ||
| .as("artifact"); | ||
|
|
||
| artifactArchiveListings.stream() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@sbespalov Please help me to figure out why this is not adding Edge to graph.
cd88509 to
53125c1
Compare
90adcc2 to
bd7bc73
Compare
bd7bc73 to
8313414
Compare
5a76d0f to
e4fa368
Compare
Pull Request Description
This pull request closes #1752
Acceptance Test
mvn clean install -Dintegration.testsstill works.mvn spring-boot:runin thestrongbox-web-corestill starts up the application correctly.strongbox-distributionfrom aziportar.gzstill works.strongbox-web-integration-testsstill run properly.Questions
Does this pull request break backward compatibility?
Does this pull request require other pull requests to be merged first?
Does this require an update of the documentation?