Skip to content

chore: remove type of date/time attribute from test #80

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dshaaban01
Copy link
Collaborator

Removed types of date/time attributes from the literal test and Export/literal tests to align with the timestamp tests. I noticed that these attributes were still present in date/time but not in timestamp tests - was this an oversight or intentional? Let me know if they were intentionally kept and will close the PR.

@dshaaban01
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ingomueller-net

Same weird download error as in #48 ...

@dshaaban01 dshaaban01 force-pushed the dalia/fixes/literal-test branch from ba124a2 to 540aed0 Compare February 6, 2025 17:27
Copy link
Collaborator

@ingomueller-net ingomueller-net left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, not intentional, good catch! Thanks!

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ substrait.plan version 0 : 42 : 1 {
%0 = named_table @t1 as ["a"] : tuple<si1>
%1 = project %0 : tuple<si1> -> tuple<si1, !substrait.time> {
^bb0(%arg : tuple<si1>):
%time = literal #substrait.time<200000000us> : !substrait.time
%time = literal #substrait.time<200000000us>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ultra nit: remove the trailing whitespaces please.

Suggested change
%time = literal #substrait.time<200000000us>
%time = literal #substrait.time<200000000us>

@ingomueller-net
Copy link
Collaborator

Remember that #74 updated LLVM. I think it'd be best to rebase your PRs to main such that (1) we don't thrash the ccache during CI and (2) we don't run into surprise breakages due to the rebase (although that's unlikely).

@ingomueller-net ingomueller-net merged commit 8e53b17 into substrait-io:main Feb 17, 2025
7 checks passed
@ingomueller-net
Copy link
Collaborator

I rebased locally in my machine and ran the tests, so need to rebase this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants