Skip to content

pandas 10 complete#28

Open
nagaraja993 wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:mainfrom
nagaraja993:main
Open

pandas 10 complete#28
nagaraja993 wants to merge 1 commit intosuper30admin:mainfrom
nagaraja993:main

Conversation

@nagaraja993
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student's solutions demonstrate a good understanding of pandas operations and grouping/aggregation techniques. Here's a detailed evaluation for each problem:

Problem1.py:

  1. Correctness: The solution correctly groups by sell_date and calculates both the number of unique products sold and a sorted comma-separated list of products. The commented-out alternative shows good problem-solving exploration.
  2. Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to the sorting operation in the lambda function.
  3. Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the grouped data.
  4. Code Quality: Well-structured and readable. The use of named aggregations is a good practice.
  5. Efficiency: The solution is efficient, though the sorting could be avoided if order wasn't a requirement.

Problem2.py:

  1. Correctness: Correctly calculates unique leads and partners per date and make_name.
  2. Time Complexity: O(n) for the grouping and counting operations.
  3. Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the grouped data.
  4. Code Quality: Clean and concise. The commented alternative shows awareness of different approaches.
  5. Efficiency: Optimal solution for the requirements.

Problem3.py:

  1. Correctness: Correctly identifies actor-director pairs with at least 3 cooperations.
  2. Time Complexity: O(n) for the grouping and counting operations.
  3. Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the grouped data.
  4. Code Quality: Good, though could be slightly more readable by using named aggregation like the other solutions.
  5. Efficiency: The solution is efficient, though the intermediate 'coop' column could be avoided by using filter().

General strengths:

  • Consistent use of pandas best practices
  • Good handling of grouping and aggregation
  • Clean code formatting
  • Shows exploration of alternative approaches (commented code)

Areas for improvement:

  • Problem3.py could benefit from named aggregations like the other solutions
  • The lambda in Problem1.py could be replaced with a predefined function for better readability
  • Some docstrings explaining the functions would be helpful

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants