Skip to content

Conversation

@avishwak
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student has provided three different solutions to the problem of finding the Nth highest salary from a DataFrame. Here's an evaluation of each solution:

  1. Solution 1 (using drop_duplicates and iloc):

    • Correctness: This solution correctly handles the problem by sorting the salaries in descending order, removing duplicates, and then selecting the Nth highest salary. It also handles edge cases where N is out of bounds by returning None.
    • Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting, where n is the number of unique salaries.
    • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the sorted and deduplicated DataFrame.
    • Code Quality: The code is clean and readable. The use of iloc is appropriate here.
    • Efficiency: The solution is efficient for typical cases, but sorting could be avoided if a more optimized approach is used (e.g., using a heap).
  2. Solution 2 (using set):

    • Correctness: This solution also correctly handles the problem by using a set to remove duplicates, sorting the unique salaries, and then selecting the Nth highest salary. It handles edge cases similarly.
    • Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting, where n is the number of unique salaries.
    • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the set and the sorted list.
    • Code Quality: The code is readable, but converting to a set and then back to a list is slightly less idiomatic for pandas operations.
    • Efficiency: Similar to Solution 1, sorting is the bottleneck here.
  3. Solution 3 (using drop_duplicates, sort_values, head, and tail):

    • Correctness: This solution is also correct and handles edge cases. It uses pandas operations more idiomatically.
    • Time Complexity: O(n log n) due to sorting, where n is the number of unique salaries.
    • Space Complexity: O(n) for storing the deduplicated and sorted DataFrame.
    • Code Quality: The code is clean and uses pandas operations effectively. The chaining of methods is clear.
    • Efficiency: Similar to the other solutions, sorting is the main operation affecting performance.

General Feedback:

  • Strengths:

    • All solutions correctly handle the problem and edge cases (e.g., N out of bounds).
    • The code is well-structured and readable.
    • The student demonstrates knowledge of different approaches to solve the problem.
  • Areas for Improvement:

    • The use of sorting in all solutions leads to O(n log n) time complexity. A more efficient approach could involve using a heap (O(n log k) where k is N), but this might be overkill for typical pandas operations.
    • Solution 2 is less idiomatic for pandas and could be simplified by using pandas' built-in methods (e.g., drop_duplicates).
    • The student could consider adding comments to explain the logic, especially for Solution 3, where method chaining might be less clear to some readers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants