Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: percentage fee strategy docs #206

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

MakMuftic
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Related Issue Or Context

Closes: #181

How Has This Been Tested? Testing details.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation

Checklist:

  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have ensured that all acceptance criteria (or expected behavior) from issue are met
  • I have updated the documentation locally and in docs.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have ensured that all the checks are passing and green, I've signed the CLA bot

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2023

Go Test coverage is 65.7 %\ ✨ ✨ ✨

docs/general/Fees.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Matija Petrunić <matija.petrunic@gmail.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2023

Go Test coverage is 65.7 %\ ✨ ✨ ✨

docs/general/Fees.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Go Test coverage is 65.7 %\ ✨ ✨ ✨

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Go Test coverage is 65.7 %\ ✨ ✨ ✨

@MakMuftic MakMuftic merged commit 800cddf into main Aug 31, 2023
8 checks passed
@MakMuftic MakMuftic deleted the mmuftic/percentage-fee-docs branch August 31, 2023 11:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants