Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DRAFT] [WIP] Architecture Decision Records #170

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sniper7kills
Copy link
Contributor

Architecture Decision Record Sample.

These really belong in their own folder; likely broken out by version in which the decision was made.

@sniper7kills sniper7kills changed the title [DRAFT] [WIP] S7k/ad rs [DRAFT] [WIP] Architecture Decision Records Oct 14, 2020
Copy link
Member

@ArlonAntonius ArlonAntonius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a good start to me

## 1.x
** Use of Config Files **

** Disallow the ordering of Affects **
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disallow sounds so rude, "Do not support", sounds slightly better

The following are a list of decisions that have been made regarding the architecture of the Tenancy package.

## 1.x
** Use of Config Files **
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to use capitalized letters config files

# Architecture Decision Records
The following are a list of decisions that have been made regarding the architecture of the Tenancy package.

## 1.x
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All of these should be listed under 0.x

- architecture
---

# TEMPLATE
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a summary please

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants