Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Runtime fv #48

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Runtime fv #48

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

aazhou1
Copy link

@aazhou1 aazhou1 commented Sep 26, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced logic for handling linked lists in both the RepoTokenList and TermAuctionList, ensuring proper initialization of pointers.
    • Improved insertion conditions to allow only tokens or auctions with strictly lesser maturity to be placed before current entries.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Fixed pointer initialization issues for empty lists, ensuring correct end-of-list indicators.

@aazhou1 aazhou1 self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
@aazhou1 aazhou1 merged commit ac74a9d into master Sep 26, 2024
0 of 4 checks passed
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on modifying the logic of the RepoTokenList and TermAuctionList libraries. Key updates include the initialization of the next pointer for newly added nodes to NULL_NODE, ensuring proper linking within the linked list structure. Additionally, the insertion conditions have been refined by changing the comparison operator from <= to <, allowing for stricter control over the order of tokens and auctions based on maturity.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/RepoTokenList.sol Updated handling of next pointer for head and end of the list; changed insertion logic to <.
src/TermAuctionList.sol Modified next pointer initialization for new nodes; adjusted insertion logic to <.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix edit offer #4: This PR modifies the RepoTokenList library, including changes to the insertion logic and handling of the next pointer, which directly relates to the changes made in the main PR.
  • Fixes to the list insert functions #46: This PR also addresses the insertion logic in both RepoTokenList and TermAuctionList, specifically changing the comparison operator from <= to < and ensuring the next pointer is set to NULL_NODE, aligning closely with the main PR's modifications.

🐇 In the list where tokens play,
A new head points the way.
With strict rules for where to go,
Each auction's fate, we now bestow.
Hopping through code, we refine,
A clearer path, oh how divine! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants