This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 29, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
Handle empty user state for sender/reciever on Rollup.disputeTransitionTransfer #655
Draft
jacque006
wants to merge
3
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
contracts/bug-empty-user-state
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
contracts
This PR changes some contracts
client
This PR is about implementing the client
labels
Aug 17, 2021
jacque006
force-pushed
the
contracts/bug-empty-user-state
branch
from
August 23, 2021 22:31
efd9681
to
2597253
Compare
jacque006
changed the title
WIP Handle empty user state for sender/reciever on Rollup.disputeTransitionTransfer
Handle empty user state for sender/reciever on Rollup.disputeTransitionTransfer
Aug 23, 2021
jacque006
force-pushed
the
contracts/bug-empty-user-state
branch
from
August 23, 2021 22:35
2597253
to
d3d3fa9
Compare
Re-working based on feedback #654 (comment) |
jacque006
force-pushed
the
contracts/bug-empty-user-state
branch
from
September 14, 2021 21:41
eb25b70
to
8898997
Compare
Add stateHash field to StateMerkleProof to allow proof to dispute empty to/from indexes. Sync some enums from Types.sol to match up in TS types in client. Add more extensive test cases for disputeTransitionTransfer for triggering rollbacks. Typo signautre -> signature.
jacque006
force-pushed
the
contracts/bug-empty-user-state
branch
from
September 22, 2021 01:07
75870d7
to
35097c8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. The Transition
part looks solid.
Comment on lines
+10
to
+11
bytes32 public constant ZERO_BYTES32 = | ||
0x290decd9548b62a8d60345a988386fc84ba6bc95484008f6362f93160ef3e563; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good one moving ZERO_BYTES32
here
Comment on lines
+32
to
+35
* @dev If this is not being externally consumed, it can be removed. | ||
*/ | ||
// solhint-disable-next-line var-name-mixedcase | ||
bytes32 public immutable ZERO_BYTES32; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Think we don't externally consume this.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #654
TODO
Stack too deep, try removing local variables.
error in numerous places.toIndex
dispute test case.