fix/sonor-cloud-issue

[TakanoTaiga]

Description

Abstract

This PR includes modifications based on the results of static analysis performed by SonarCloud. Please refer to the SonarCloud reference for details on the issue fixes.

Background

N/A

Details

N/A

References

• https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?open=AZINWTIMjvEq9OQMnMAi&id=tier4_scenario_simulator_v2
• https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?open=AZJS0wrRtJsnZH2iyX98&id=tier4_scenario_simulator_v2
• https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?open=AZINWTIMjvEq9OQMnMAj&id=tier4_scenario_simulator_v2
• https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?open=AZINWTKejvEq9OQMnMEw&id=tier4_scenario_simulator_v2
• https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?open=AZINWTKTjvEq9OQMnMEs&id=tier4_scenario_simulator_v2
• https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?open=AZJS0wsGtJsnZH2iyX-H&id=tier4_scenario_simulator_v2

Destructive Changes

N/A

Known Limitations

N/A

[github-actions]

Checklist for reviewers ☑️

All references to "You" in the following text refer to the code reviewer.

• Is this pull request written in a way that is easy to read from a third-party perspective?
• Is there sufficient information (background, purpose, specification, algorithm description, list of disruptive changes, and migration guide) in the description of this pull request?
• If this pull request contains a destructive change, does this pull request contain the migration guide?
• Labels of this pull request are valid?
• All unit tests/integration tests are included in this pull request? If you think adding test cases is unnecessary, please describe why and cross out this line.
• The documentation for this pull request is enough? If you think adding documents for this pull request is unnecessary, please describe why and cross out this line.

[hakuturu583]

Code is LGTM.
Start regression test.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
47.1% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud