Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow tsdb as alias for timescaledb in WITH clauses #7765

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2025

Conversation

svenklemm
Copy link
Member

@svenklemm svenklemm commented Feb 21, 2025

  • Allow tsdb as alias for timescaledb in WITH clauses

Copy link

@gayyappan, @mkindahl: please review this pull request.

Powered by pull-review

@svenklemm svenklemm changed the title tsdb alias Allow tsdb as alias for timescaledb in WITH clauses Feb 21, 2025
@svenklemm svenklemm force-pushed the tsdb_alias branch 3 times, most recently from 05d1a53 to 9561ee9 Compare February 21, 2025 23:01
This patch allows tsdb as alias for timescaledb in WITH and SET
clauses to save on some typing.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.94%. Comparing base (59f50f2) to head (9158ca0).
Report is 791 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7765      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.06%   81.94%   +1.87%     
==========================================
  Files         190      247      +57     
  Lines       37181    45432    +8251     
  Branches     9450    11356    +1906     
==========================================
+ Hits        29770    37230    +7460     
- Misses       2997     3730     +733     
- Partials     4414     4472      +58     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@svenklemm svenklemm merged commit c687fb7 into timescale:main Feb 22, 2025
47 of 48 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants