Documentation Authors: Marcin Grzejszczak
Spring, Spring Boot and Spring Cloud are tools that allow developers speed up the time of creating new business features. It’s common knowledge however that the feature is only valuable if it’s in production. That’s why companies spend a lot of time and resources on building their own deployment pipelines.
This project tries to solve the following problems:
-
Creation of a common deployment pipeline
-
Propagation of good testing & deployment practices
-
Speed up the time required to deploy a feature to production
A common way of running, configuring and deploying applications lowers support costs and time needed by new developers to blend in when they change projects.
This repo contains an opinionated pipeline to deploy a Spring Cloud based microservice. We’ve taken the following opinionated decisions:
-
usage of Spring Cloud, Spring Cloud Contract Stub Runner and Spring Cloud Eureka
-
application deployment to Cloud Foundry
-
For Maven:
-
usage of Maven Wrapper
-
artifacts deployment by
./mvnw clean deploy
-
stubrunner.ids
property to retrieve list of collaborators for which stubs should be downloaded -
running smoke tests on a deployed app via the
smoke
Maven profile -
running end to end tests on a deployed app via the
e2e
Maven profile
-
-
For Gradle (in the
github-analytics
application check thegradle/pipeline.gradle
file):-
usage of Gradlew Wrapper
-
deploy
task for artifacts deployment -
running smoke tests on a deployed app via the
smoke
task -
running end to end tests on a deployed app via the
e2e
task -
groupId
task to retrieve group id -
artifactId
task to retrieve artifact id -
currentVersion
task to retrieve the current version -
stubIds
task to retrieve list of collaborators for which stubs should be downloaded
-
This is the initial approach that can be easily changed since all the core deployment logic is done in a form of Bash scripts.
You can go through the setup of the demo environment for
Each of these setups are available under the folders jenkins
and
concourse
respectively.
In the following section we will describe in more depth the rationale behind the presented opinionated pipeline. We will go through each deployment step and describe it in details.
.
├── common
├── concourse
├── docs
└── jenkins
In the common
folder you can find all the Bash scripts containing the pipeline logic. These
scripts are reused by both Concourse and Jenkins pipelines.
In the concourse
folder you can find all the necessary scripts and setup to run Concourse demo.
In the docs
section you have the whole documentation of the project.
In the jenkins
folder you can find all the necessary scripts and setup to run Jenkins demo.
This repository can be treated as a template for your pipeline. We provide some opinionated implementation that you can alter to suit your needs. The best approach to use it to build your production projects would be to download the Spring Cloud Pipelines repository as ZIP, then init a Git project there and modify it as you wish.
Example for using the code from master
branch. You can use a tag for example 1.0.0.M2
. Then your URL will look like this
https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-pipelines/archive/1.0.0.M2.zip
.
curl -LOk https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-pipelines/archive/master.zip
unzip master.zip
cd spring-cloud-pipelines-master
git init
# modify the pipelines to suit your needs
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit"
git remote add origin ${YOUR_REPOSITORY_URL}
git push origin master
Note
|
Why aren’t you simply cloning the repo? This is meant to be a seed for building new, versioned pipelines for you. You don’t want to have all of our history dragged along with you, don’t you? |
Let’s take a look at the flow of the opinionated pipeline
We’ll first describe the overall concept behind the flow and then we’ll split it into pieces and describe every piece independently.
So we’re on the same page let’s define some common vocabulary. We discern 4 typical environments in terms of running the pipeline.
-
build
-
test
-
stage
-
prod
Build environment is a machine where the building of the application takes place. It’s a CI / CD tool worker.
Test is an environment where you can deploy an application to test it. It doesn’t resemble production, we can’t be sure of it’s state (which application is deployed there and in which version). It can be used by multiple teams at the same time.
Stage is an environment that does resemble production. Most likely applications are deployed there in versions that correspond to those deployed to production. Typically databases there are filled up with (obfuscated) production data. Most often this environment is a single, shared one between many teams. In other words in order to run some performance, user acceptance tests you have to block and wait until the environment is free.
Prod is a production environment where we want our tested applications to be deployed for our customers.
Unit tests - tests that are executed on the application during the build phase. No integrations with databases / HTTP server stubs etc. take place. Generally speaking your application should have plenty of these to have fast feedback if your features are working fine.
Integration tests - tests that are executed on the built application during the build phase. Integrations with in memory databases / HTTP server stubs take place. According to the test pyramid, in most cases you should have not too many of these kind of tests.
Smoke tests - tests that are executed on a deployed application. The concept of these tests is to check the crucial parts of your application are working properly. If you have 100 features in your application but you gain most money from e.g. 5 features then you could write smoke tests for those 5 features. As you can see we’re talking about smoke tests of an application, not of the whole system. In our understanding inside the opinionated pipeline, these tests are executed against an application that is surrounded with stubs.
End to end tests - tests that are executed on a system composing of multiple applications. The idea of these tests is to check if the tested feature works when the whole system is set up. Due to the fact that it takes a lot of time, effort, resources to maintain such an environment and that often those tests are unreliable (due to many different moving pieces like network database etc.) you should have a handful of those tests. Only for critical parts of your business. Since only production is the key verifier of whether your feature works, some companies don’t even want to do those and move directly to deployment to production. When your system contains KPI monitoring and alerting you can quickly react when your deployed application is not behaving properly.
Performance testing - tests executed on an application or set of applications to check if your system can handle big load of input. In case of our opinionated pipeline these tests could be executed either on test (against stubbed environment) or stage (against the whole system)
Before we go into details of the flow let’s take a look at the following example.
When having only a handful of applications, performing end to end testing is beneficial. From the operations perspective it’s maintainable for a finite number of deployed instances. From the developers perspective it’s nice to verify the whole flow in the system for a feature.
In case of microservices the scale starts to be a problem:
The questions arise:
-
Should I queue deployments of microservices on one testing environment or should I have an environment per microservice?
-
If I queue deployments people will have to wait for hours to have their tests ran - that can be a problem
-
-
To remove that issue I can have an environment per microservice
-
Who will pay the bills (imagine 100 microservices - each having each own environment).
-
Who will support each of those environments?
-
Should we spawn a new environment each time we execute a new pipeline and then wrap it up or should we have them up and running for the whole day?
-
-
In which versions should I deploy the dependent microservices - development or production versions?
-
If I have development versions then I can test my application against a feature that is not yet on production. That can lead to exceptions on production
-
If I test against production versions then I’ll never be able to test against a feature under development anytime before deployment to production.
-
One of the possibilities of tackling these problems is to… not do end to end tests.
If we stub out all the dependencies of our application then most of the problems presented above disappear. There is no need to start and setup infrastructure required by the dependant microservices. That way the testing setup looks like this:
Such an approach to testing and deployment gives the following benefits (thanks to the usage of Spring Cloud Contract):
-
No need to deploy dependant services
-
The stubs used for the tests ran on a deployed microservice are the same as those used during integration tests
-
Those stubs have been tested against the application that produces them (check Spring Cloud Contract for more information)
-
We don’t have many slow tests running on a deployed application - thus the pipeline gets executed much faster
-
We don’t have to queue deployments - we’re testing in isolation thus pipelines don’t interfere with each other
-
We don’t have to spawn virtual machines each time for deployment purposes
It brings however the following challenges:
-
No end to end tests before production - you don’t have the full certainty that a feature is working
-
First time the applications will talk in a real way will be on production
Like every solution it has its benefits and drawbacks. The opinionated pipeline allows you to configure whether you want to follow this flow or not.
The general view behind this deployment pipeline is to:
-
test the application in isolation
-
test the backwards compatibility of the application in order to roll it back if necessary
-
allow testing of the packaged app in a deployed environment
-
allow user acceptance tests / performance tests in a deployed environment
-
allow deployment to production
Obviously the pipeline could have been split to more steps but it seems that all of the aforementioned actions comprise nicely in our opinionated proposal.
For the demo purposes we’re providing Docker Compose setup with Artifactory and Concourse / Jenkins tools.
Regardless of the picked CD application for the pipeline to pass one needs a Cloud Foundry instance (for example
Pivotal Web Services or PCF Dev) and the
infrastructure applications deployed to the JAR hosting application (for the demo we’re providing Artifactory).
The infrastructure applications are Eureka
for Service Discovery and Stub Runner Boot
for running
Spring Cloud Contract stubs.
Tip
|
In the demos we’re showing you how to first build the github-webhook project. That’s because
the github-analytics needs the stubs of github-webhook to pass the tests. Below you’ll find
references to github-analytics project since it contains more interesting pieces as far as testing
is concerned.
|
In this step we’re generating a version of the pipeline and then we’re publishing 2 artifacts to Artifactory / Nexus:
-
a fat jar of the application
-
a Spring Cloud Contract jar containing stubs of the application
During this phase we’re executing a Maven
build using Maven Wrapper or a Gradle
build using Gradle Wrapper
, with unit and integration tests. We’re also tagging the repository with dev/${version}
format. That way in each
subsequent step of the pipeline we’re able to retrieve the tagged version. Also we know
exactly which version of the pipeline corresponds to which Git hash.
Here we’re
-
starting a RabbitMQ service in Cloud Foundry
-
deploying
Eureka
infrastructure application to Cloud Foundry -
downloading the fat jar from Nexus and we’re uploading it to Cloud Foundry. We want the application to run in isolation (be surrounded by stubs). Currently due to port constraints in Cloud Foundry we cannot run multiple stubbed HTTP services in the cloud so to fix this issue we’re running the application with
smoke
Spring profile on which you can stub out all HTTP calls to return a mocked response -
if the application is using a database then it gets upgraded at this point via Flyway, Liquibase or any other tool once the application gets started
-
from the project’s Maven or Gradle build we’re extracting
stubrunner.ids
property that contains all thegroupId:artifactId:version:classifier
notation of dependant projects for which the stubs should be downloaded. -
then we’re uploading
Stub Runner Boot
and pass the extractedstubrunner.ids
to it. That way we’ll have a running application in Cloud Foundry that will download all the necessary stubs of our application -
from the checked out code we’re running the tests available under the
smoke
profile. In the case of GitHub Analytics application we’re triggering a message from the GitHub Webhook application’s stub, that is sent via RabbitMQ to GitHub Analytics. Then we’re checking if message count has increased. You can check those tests here. -
once the tests pass we’re searching for the last production release. Once the application is deployed to production we’re tagging it with
prod/${version}
tag. If there is no such tag (there was no production release) there will be no rollback tests executed. If there was a production release the tests will get executed. -
assuming that there was a production release we’re checking out the code corresponding to that release (we’re checking out the tag), we’re downloading the appropriate fat jar and we’re uploading it to Cloud Foundry. IMPORTANT the old jar is running against the NEW version of the database.
-
we’re running the old
smoke
tests against the freshly deployed application surrounded by stubs. If those tests pass then we have a high probability that the application is backwards compatible -
the default behaviour is that after all of those steps the user can manually click to deploy the application to a stage environment
Here we’re
-
starting a RabbitMQ service in Cloud Foundry
-
deploying
Eureka
infrastructure application to Cloud Foundry -
downloading the fat jar from Nexus and we’re uploading it to Cloud Foundry.
Next we have a manual step in which:
-
from the checked out code we’re running the tests available under the
e2e
profile. In the case of GitHub Analytics application we’re sending a HTTP message to GitHub Analytic’s endpoint. Then we’re checking if the received message count has increased. You can check those tests here.
The step is manual by default due to the fact that stage environment is often shared between teams and some preparations on databases / infrastructure have to take place before running the tests. Ideally these step should be fully automatic.
The step to deploy to production is manual but ideally it should be automatic.
Here we’re
-
starting a RabbitMQ service in Cloud Foundry (only for the demo to pass - you should provision the prod environment in a different way)
-
deploying
Eureka
infrastructure application to Cloud Foundry (only for the demo to pass - you should provision the prod environment in a different way) -
tagging the Git repo with
prod/${version}
tag -
downloading the fat jar from Nexus
-
we’re doing Blue Green deployment on Cloud Foundry
-
we’re renaming the current instance of the app e.g.
fooService
tofooService-venerable
-
we’re deploying the new instance of the app under the
fooService
name -
now two instances of the same application are running on production
-
in the
Complete switch over
which is a manual step -
we’re deleting the old instance
-
remember to run this step only after you have confirmed that both instances are working fine!
The repository contains an opinionated pipeline that will build and deploy - Github Webhook application.
All in all there are the following projects taking part in the whole microservice setup
for this demo.
-
Github-Analytics - the app that has a REST endpoint and uses messaging. Our business application.
-
Github Webhook - project that emits messages that are used by Github Analytics. Our business application.
-
Eureka - simple Eureka Server. This is an infrastructure application.
-
Github Analytics Stub Runner Boot - Stub Runner Boot server to be used for tests with Github Analytics. Uses Eureka and Messaging. This is an infrastructure application.
If you want to just run the demo as far as possible using PCF Dev and Docker Compose
Below you can find optional steps needed to be taken when you want to customize the pipeline
You need to fork only these. That’s because only then will your user be able to tag and push the tag to repo.
Concourse + Artifactory can be run locally. To do that just execute the
start.sh
script from this repo.
git clone https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-pipelines
cd spring-cloud-pipelines/concourse
./setup_docker_compose.sh
./start.sh 192.168.99.100
The setup_docker_compose.sh
script should be executed once only to allow
generation of keys.
The 192.168.99.100
param is an example of an external URL of Concourse
(equal to Docker-Machine ip in this example).
Then Concourse will be running on port 8080
and Artifactory 8081
.
git clone https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-pipelines
cd spring-cloud-pipelines/
./tools/deploy-infra.sh
As a result both eureka
and stub runner
repos will be cloned, built
and uploaded to Artifactory.
TIP: You can skip this step if you have CF installed and don’t want to use PCF Dev The only thing you have to do is to set up spaces.
Warning
|
It’s more than likely that you’ll run out of resources when you reach stage step. Don’t worry! Keep calm and clear some apps from PCF Dev and continue. |
You have to download and start PCF Dev. A link how to do it is available here.
The default credentials when using PCF Dev are:
username: user
password: pass
email: user
org: pcfdev-org
space: pcfdev-space
api: api.local.pcfdev.io
You can start the PCF dev like this:
cf dev start
You’ll have to create 3 separate spaces (email admin, pass admin)
cf login -a https://api.local.pcfdev.io --skip-ssl-validation -u admin -p admin -o pcfdev-org
cf create-space pcfdev-test
cf set-space-role user pcfdev-org pcfdev-test SpaceDeveloper
cf create-space pcfdev-stage
cf set-space-role user pcfdev-org pcfdev-stage SpaceDeveloper
cf create-space pcfdev-prod
cf set-space-role user pcfdev-org pcfdev-prod SpaceDeveloper
You can also execute the ./tools/pcfdev-helper.sh setup-spaces
to do this.
You can click one of the icons (depending on your OS) to download fly
, which is the Concourse CLI. Once you’ve downloaded that (and maybe added to your PATH) you can run:
fly --version
If fly
is properly installed then it should print out the version.
The repo comes with credentials-sample.yml
which is set up with sample data (most credentials) are set to be applicable for PCF Dev. Copy this file to a new file credentials.yml
(the file is added to .gitignore so don’t worry that you’ll push it with your passwords) and edit it as you wish. For our demo jus setup:
-
app-url
- url pointing to your forkedgithub-webhook
repo -
github-private-key
- your private key to clone / tag GitHub repos -
repo-with-jars
- the IP is set to the defaults for Docker Machine. You should update it to point to your setup
If you don’t have a Docker Machine just execute ./whats_my_ip.sh
script to
get an external IP that you can pass to your repo-with-jars
instead of the default
Docker Machine IP.
Below you can see what environment variables are required by the scripts. To the right hand side you can see the default values for PCF Dev that we set in the credentials-sample.yml
.
Property Name | Property Description | Default value |
---|---|---|
CF_TEST_API_URL |
The URL to the CF Api for TEST env |
api.local.pcfdev.io |
CF_STAGE_API_URL |
The URL to the CF Api for STAGE env |
api.local.pcfdev.io |
CF_PROD_API_URL |
The URL to the CF Api for PROD env |
api.local.pcfdev.io |
CF_TEST_ORG |
Name of the org for the test env |
pcfdev-org |
CF_TEST_SPACE |
Name of the space for the test env |
pcfdev-space |
CF_STAGE_ORG |
Name of the org for the stage env |
pcfdev-org |
CF_STAGE_SPACE |
Name of the space for the stage env |
pcfdev-space |
CF_PROD_ORG |
Name of the org for the prod env |
pcfdev-org |
CF_PROD_SPACE |
Name of the space for the prod env |
pcfdev-space |
REPO_WITH_JARS |
URL to repo with the deployed jars |
|
M2_SETTINGS_REPO_ID |
The id of server from Maven settings.xml |
artifactory-local |
CF_HOSTNAME_UUID |
Additional suffix for the route. In a shared environment the default routes can be already taken |
Log in (e.g. for Concourse running at 192.168.99.100
- if you don’t provide any value then localhost
is assumed). If you execute this script (it assumes that either fly
is on your PATH
or it’s in the same folder as the script is):
./login.sh 192.168.99.100
Next run the command to create the pipeline.
./set_pipeline.sh
Then you’ll create a github-webhook
pipeline under the docker
alias, using the provided credentials.yml
file.
You can override these values in exactly that order (e.g. ./set-pipeline.sh some-project another-target some-other-credentials.yml
)
Not really. This is an opinionated pipeline
that’s why we took some
opinionated decisions like:
-
usage of Spring Cloud, Spring Cloud Contract Stub Runner and Spring Cloud Eureka
-
application deployment to Cloud Foundry
-
For Maven:
-
usage of Maven Wrapper
-
artifacts deployment by
./mvnw clean deploy
-
stubrunner.ids
property to retrieve list of collaborators for which stubs should be downloaded -
running smoke tests on a deployed app via the
smoke
Maven profile -
running end to end tests on a deployed app via the
e2e
Maven profile
-
-
For Gradle (in the
github-analytics
application check thegradle/pipeline.gradle
file):-
usage of Gradlew Wrapper
-
deploy
task for artifacts deployment -
running smoke tests on a deployed app via the
smoke
task -
running end to end tests on a deployed app via the
e2e
task -
groupId
task to retrieve group id -
artifactId
task to retrieve artifact id -
currentVersion
task to retrieve the current version -
stubIds
task to retrieve list of collaborators for which stubs should be downloaded
-
This is the initial approach that can be easily changed in the future.
Sure! It’s open-source! The important thing is that the core part of the logic is written in Bash scripts. That way, in the majority of cases, you could change only the bash scripts without changing the whole pipeline. You can check out the scripts here.
When deploying the app to stage or prod you can get an exception Insufficient resources
. The way to
solve it is to kill some apps from test / stage env. To achieve that just call
cf target -o pcfdev-org -s pcfdev-test
cf stop github-webhook
cf stop github-eureka
cf stop stubrunner
You can also execute ./tools/pcfdev-helper.sh kill-all-apps
that will remove
all demo-related apps deployed to PCF dev.
You must have pushed some tags and have removed the Artifactory volume that contained them. To fix this, just remove the tags
git tag -l | xargs -n 1 git push --delete origin
Yes! Assuming that pieline name is github-webhook
and job name is build-and-upload
you can running
fly watch --job github-webhook/build-and-upload -t docker
Don’t worry… most likely you’ve just forgotten to click the play
button to
unpause the pipeline. Click to the top left, expand the list of pipelines and click
the play
button next to github-webhook
.
Another problem that might occur is that you need to have the version
branch.
Concourse will wait for the version
branch to appear in your repo. So in order for
the pipeline to start ensure that when doing some git operations you haven’t
forgotten to create / copy the version
branch too.
If you play around with Jenkins / Concourse you might end up with the routes occupied
Using route github-webhook-test.local.pcfdev.io
Binding github-webhook-test.local.pcfdev.io to github-webhook...
FAILED
The route github-webhook-test.local.pcfdev.io is already in use.
Just delete the routes
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-webhook-test
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-eureka-test
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n stubrunner-test
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-webhook-stage
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-eureka-stage
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-webhook-prod
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-eureka-prod
You can also execute the ./tools/pcfdev-helper.sh delete-routes
Most likely you’ve forgotten to update your local settings.xml
with the Artifactory’s
setup. Check out this section of the docs and update your settings.xml
.
The repository contains job definitions and the opinionated setup pipeline using Jenkins Job Dsl plugin. Those jobs will form an empty pipeline and a sample, opinionated one that you can use in your company.
All in all there are the following projects taking part in the whole microservice setup
for this demo.
-
Github-Analytics - the app that has a REST endpoint and uses messaging. Our business application.
-
Github Webhook - project that emits messages that are used by Github Analytics. Our business application.
-
Eureka - simple Eureka Server. This is an infrastructure application.
-
Github Analytics Stub Runner Boot - Stub Runner Boot server to be used for tests with Github Analytics. Uses Eureka and Messaging. This is an infrastructure application.
.
├── declarative-pipeline
│ └── Jenkinsfile-sample.groovy
├── jobs
│ ├── jenkins_pipeline_empty.groovy
│ ├── jenkins_pipeline_jenkinsfile_empty.groovy
│ ├── jenkins_pipeline_sample.groovy
│ └── jenkins_pipeline_sample_view.groovy
├── seed
│ ├── gradle.properties
│ ├── init.groovy
│ ├── jenkins_pipeline.groovy
│ └── settings.xml
└── src
├── main
└── test
In the declarative-pipeline
you can find a definition of a Jenkinsfile-sample.groovy
declarative
pipeline. It’s used together with the Blueocean UI.
In the jobs
folder you have all the seed jobs that will generate pipelines.
-
jenkins_pipeline_empty.groovy
- is a template of a pipeline with empty steps using the Jenkins Job DSL plugin -
jenkins_pipeline_jenkinsfile_empty.groovy
- is a template of a pipeline with empty steps using the Pipeline plugin -
jenkins_pipeline_sample.groovy
- is an opinionated implementation using the Jenkins Job DSL plugin -
jenkins_pipeline_sample_view.groovy
- builds the views for the pipelines
In the seed
folder you have the init.groovy
file which is executed when Jenkins starts.
That way we can configure most of Jenkins options for you (adding credentials, JDK etc.).
jenkins_pipeline.groovy
contains logic to build a seed job (that way you don’t have to even click that
job - we generate it for you).
In the src
folder you have production and test classes needed for you to build your own pipeline.
Currently we have tests only cause the whole logic resides in the jenkins_pipeline_sample
file.
This is a guide for Jenkins JOB Dsl based pipeline.
If you want to just run the demo as far as possible using PCF Dev and Docker Compose
Below you can find optional steps needed to be taken when you want to customize the pipeline
You need to fork only these. That’s because only then will your user be able to tag and push the tag to repo.
Jenkins + Artifactory can be ran locally. To do that just execute the
start.sh
script from this repo.
git clone https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-pipelines
cd spring-cloud-pipelines/jenkins
./start.sh yourGitUsername yourGitPassword yourForkedGithubOrg
Then Jenkins will be running on port 8080
and Artifactory 8081
.
The provided parameters will be passed as env variables to Jenkins VM
and credentials will be set in your set. That way you don’t have to do
any manual work on the Jenkins side. In the above parameters, the third parameter
could be yourForkedGithubOrg or yourGithubUsername. Also the REPOS
env variable will
contain your GitHub org in which you have the forked repos.
git clone https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-pipelines
cd spring-cloud-pipelines/
./tools/deploy-infra.sh
As a result both eureka
and stub runner
repos will be cloned, built
and uploaded to Artifactory.
Tip
|
You can skip this step if you have CF installed and don’t want to use PCF Dev The only thing you have to do is to set up spaces. |
Warning
|
It’s more than likely that you’ll run out of resources when you reach stage step. Don’t worry! Keep calm and clear some apps from PCF Dev and continue. |
You have to download and start PCF Dev. A link how to do it is available here.
The default credentials when using PCF Dev are:
username: user
password: pass
email: user
org: pcfdev-org
space: pcfdev-space
api: api.local.pcfdev.io
You can start the PCF dev like this:
cf dev start
You’ll have to create 3 separate spaces (email admin, pass admin)
cf login -a https://api.local.pcfdev.io --skip-ssl-validation -u admin -p admin -o pcfdev-org
cf create-space pcfdev-test
cf set-space-role user pcfdev-org pcfdev-test SpaceDeveloper
cf create-space pcfdev-stage
cf set-space-role user pcfdev-org pcfdev-stage SpaceDeveloper
cf create-space pcfdev-prod
cf set-space-role user pcfdev-org pcfdev-prod SpaceDeveloper
You can also execute the ./tools/pcfdev-helper.sh setup-spaces
to do this.
We already create the seed job for you but you’ll have to run it. When you do run it you have to provide some properties. By default we create a seed that has all the properties options, but you can delete most of it. If you set the properties as global env variables you have to remove them from the seed.
Anyways, to run the demo just provide in the REPOS
var the comma separated
list of URLs of the 2 aforementioned forks of github-webhook
and `github-analytics'.
REPOS
parameter with URLs of your forks (you’ll have more properties than the ones in the screenshot)
We already create the seed job for you but you’ll have to run it. When you do run it you have to provide some properties. By default we create a seed that has all the properties options, but you can delete most of it. If you set the properties as global env variables you have to remove them from the seed.
Anyways, to run the demo just provide in the REPOS
var the comma separated
list of URLs of the 2 aforementioned forks of github-webhook
and github-analytics
.
Important
|
Most likely your 1st build will suddenly hang for 10 minutes. If you rerun it again it should work after 2-3 minutes. My guess is that it’s related to Docker Compose so sorry for this unfortunate situation. |
Important
|
If your build fails on the deploy previous version to stage due to missing jar, that means that you’ve forgotten to clear the tags in your repo. Typically that’s due to the fact that you’ve removed the Artifactory volume with deployed JAR whereas a tag in the repo is still pointing there. Check out this section on how to remove the tag. |
Important
|
Most likely you will run out of memory so when reaching the stage environment it’s good to kill all apps on test. Check out the FAQ section for more details! |
You can also use the declarative pipeline approach with the Blue Ocean UI. Here is a step by step guide to run a pipeline via this approach.
The Blue Ocean UI is available under the blue/
URL. E.g. for Docker Machine based setup http://192.168.99.100:8080/blue
.
Important
|
There is no possibility of restarting pipeline from specific stage, after failure. Please check out this issue for more information |
Warning
|
Currently there is no way to introduce manual steps in a performant way. Jenkins is blocking an executor when manual step is required. That means that you’ll run out of executors pretty fast. You can check out this issue for and this StackOverflow question for more information. |
All the steps below are not necessary to run the demo. They are needed only when you want to do some custom changes.
It’s enough to set the ARTIFACTORY_URL
environmental variable before
executing tools/deploy-infra.sh
. Example for deploying to Artifactory at IP 192.168.99.100
git clone https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-pipelines
cd spring-cloud-pipelines/
ARTIFACTORY_URL="http://192.168.99.100:8081/artifactory/libs-release-local" ./tools/deploy-infra.sh
Tip
|
If you want to use the default connection to the Docker version of Artifactory you can skip this step |
So that ./mvnw deploy
works with Artifactory from Docker we’re
already copying the missing settings.xml
file for you. It looks like this:
<server>
<id>artifactory-local</id>
<username>admin</username>
<password>password</password>
</server>
If you want to use your own version of Artifactory / Nexus you have to update
the file (it’s in seed/settings.xml
).
If you want to only play around with the demo that we’ve prepared you have to set ONE variable which is the REPOS
variable.
That variable needs to consists of comma separated list of URLs to repositories containing business apps. So you should pass your forked repos URLs.
You can do it in the following ways:
-
globally via Jenkins global env vars (then when you run the seed that variable will be taken into consideration and proper pipelines will get built)
-
modify the seed job parameters (you’ll have to modify the seed job configuration and change the
REPOS
property) -
provide the repos parameter when running the seed job
For the sake of simplicity let’s go with the last option.
Important
|
If you’re choosing the global envs, you HAVE to remove the other approach
(e.g. if you set the global env for REPOS , please remove that property in the
seed job
|
Click on the seed job and pick Build with parameters
. Then as presented in the screen below (you’ll have far more properties to set) just modify the REPOS
property by providing the comma separated list of URLs to your forks. Whatever you set will be parsed by the seed job and passed to the generated Jenkins jobs.
Tip
|
This is very useful when the repos you want to build differ. E.g. use
different JDK. Then some seeds can set the JDK_VERSION param to one version
of Java installation and the others to another one.
|
Example screen:
In the screenshot we could parametrize the REPOS
and REPO_WITH_JARS
params.
Important
|
This section is presented only for informational purposes - for the sake of demo you can skip it |
You can add env vars (go to configure Jenkins → Global Properties) for the following properties (the defaults are for PCF Dev):
Example screen:
The env vars that are used in all of the jobs are as follows:
Property Name | Property Description | Default value |
---|---|---|
CF_TEST_API_URL |
The URL to the CF Api for TEST env |
api.local.pcfdev.io |
CF_STAGE_API_URL |
The URL to the CF Api for STAGE env |
api.local.pcfdev.io |
CF_PROD_API_URL |
The URL to the CF Api for PROD env |
api.local.pcfdev.io |
CF_TEST_ORG |
Name of the org for the test env |
pcfdev-org |
CF_TEST_SPACE |
Name of the space for the test env |
pcfdev-space |
CF_STAGE_ORG |
Name of the org for the stage env |
pcfdev-org |
CF_STAGE_SPACE |
Name of the space for the stage env |
pcfdev-space |
CF_PROD_ORG |
Name of the org for the prod env |
pcfdev-org |
CF_PROD_SPACE |
Name of the space for the prod env |
pcfdev-space |
REPO_WITH_JARS |
URL to repo with the deployed jars |
|
M2_SETTINGS_REPO_ID |
The id of server from Maven settings.xml |
artifactory-local |
JDK_VERSION |
The name of the JDK installation |
jdk8 |
PIPELINE_VERSION |
What should be the version of the pipeline (ultimately also version of the jar) |
1.0.0.M1-${GROOVY,script ="new Date().format('yyMMdd_HHmmss')"}-VERSION |
GIT_EMAIL |
The email used by Git to tag repo |
|
GIT_NAME |
The name used by Git to tag repo |
Pivo Tal |
CF_HOSTNAME_UUID |
Additional suffix for the route. In a shared environment the default routes can be already taken |
|
AUTO_DEPLOY_TO_STAGE |
Should deployment to stage be automatic |
false |
AUTO_DEPLOY_TO_PROD |
Should deployment to prod be automatic |
false |
ROLLBACK_STEP_REQUIRED |
Should rollback step be present |
true |
DEPLOY_TO_STAGE_STEP_REQUIRED |
Should deploy to stage step be present |
true |
Since our pipeline is setting the git user / name explicitly for the build step
you’d have to go to Configure
of the build step and modify the Git name / email.
If you want to set it globally you’ll have to remove the section from the build
step and follow these steps to set it globally.
You can set Git email / user globally like this:
In your scripts we reference the credentials via IDs. These are the defaults for credentials
Property Name | Property Description | Default value |
---|---|---|
GIT_CREDENTIAL_ID |
Credential ID used to tag a git repo |
git |
CF_TEST_CREDENTIAL_ID |
Credential ID for CF Test env access |
cf-test |
CF_STAGE_CREDENTIAL_ID |
Credential ID for CF Stage env access |
cf-stage |
CF_PROD_CREDENTIAL_ID |
Credential ID for CF Prod env access |
cf-prod |
If you already have in your system a credential to for example tag a repo
you can use it by passing the value of the property GIT_CREDENTIAL_ID
You have to set credentials with id: git
.
Below you can find instructions on how to set a credential (e.g. for cf-test
credential but
remember to provide the one with id git
).
If you would like to run the pre-configured Jenkins image somewhere other than your local machine, we
have an image you can pull and use on DockerHub.
The latest
tag corresponds to the latest snapshot build. You can also find tags
corresponding to stable releases that you can use as well.
You can check the Jenkins logs and you’ll see
WARNING: Skipped parameter `PIPELINE_VERSION` as it is undefined on `jenkins-pipeline-sample-build`.
Set `-Dhudson.model.ParametersAction.keepUndefinedParameters`=true to allow undefined parameters
to be injected as environment variables or
`-Dhudson.model.ParametersAction.safeParameters=[comma-separated list]`
to whitelist specific parameter names, even though it represents a security breach
To fix it you have to do exactly what the warning suggests… Also ensure that the Groovy token macro processing
checkbox is set.
You can see that the Jenkins version is properly set but in the build version is still snapshot and
the echo "${PIPELINE_VERSION}"
doesn’t print anything.
You can check the Jenkins logs and you’ll see
WARNING: Skipped parameter `PIPELINE_VERSION` as it is undefined on `jenkins-pipeline-sample-build`.
Set `-Dhudson.model.ParametersAction.keepUndefinedParameters`=true to allow undefined parameters
to be injected as environment variables or
`-Dhudson.model.ParametersAction.safeParameters=[comma-separated list]`
to whitelist specific parameter names, even though it represents a security breach
To fix it you have to do exactly what the warning suggests…
Docker compose, docker compose, docker compose… The problem is that for some reason, only in Docker, the execution of Java hangs. But it hangs randomly and only the first time you try to execute the pipeline.
The solution to this is to run the pipeline again. If once it suddenly, magically passes then it will pass for any subsequent build.
Another thing that you can try is to run it with plain Docker. Maybe that will help.
Sure! you can pass REPOS
variable with comma separated list of
project_name$project_url
format. If you don’t provide the PROJECT_NAME the
repo name will be extracted and used as the name of the project.
E.g. for REPOS
equal to:
will result in the creation of pipelines with root names github-analytics
and github-webhook
.
E.g. for REPOS
equal to:
foo$https://github.com/spring-cloud-samples/github-analytics,bar$https://github.com/spring-cloud-samples/atom-feed
will result in the creation of pipelines with root names foo
for github-analytics
and bar
for github-webhook
.
Not really. This is an opinionated pipeline
that’s why we took some
opinionated decisions like:
-
usage of Spring Cloud, Spring Cloud Contract Stub Runner and Spring Cloud Eureka
-
application deployment to Cloud Foundry
-
For Maven:
-
usage of Maven Wrapper
-
artifacts deployment by
./mvnw clean deploy
-
stubrunner.ids
property to retrieve list of collaborators for which stubs should be downloaded -
running smoke tests on a deployed app via the
smoke
Maven profile -
running end to end tests on a deployed app via the
e2e
Maven profile
-
-
For Gradle (in the
github-analytics
application check thegradle/pipeline.gradle
file):-
usage of Gradlew Wrapper
-
deploy
task for artifacts deployment -
running smoke tests on a deployed app via the
smoke
task -
running end to end tests on a deployed app via the
e2e
task -
groupId
task to retrieve group id -
artifactId
task to retrieve artifact id -
currentVersion
task to retrieve the current version -
stubIds
task to retrieve list of collaborators for which stubs should be downloaded
-
This is the initial approach that can be easily changed in the future.
Sure! It’s open-source! The important thing is that the core part of the logic is written in Bash scripts. That way, in the majority of cases, you could change only the bash scripts without changing the whole pipeline.
[jenkins_resources]] When deploying the app to stage or prod you can get an exception Insufficient resources
. The way to
solve it is to kill some apps from test / stage env. To achieve that just call
cf target -o pcfdev-org -s pcfdev-test
cf stop github-webhook
cf stop github-eureka
cf stop stubrunner
You can also execute ./tools/pcfdev-helper.sh kill-all-apps
that will remove all demo-related apps
deployed to PCF dev.
You must have pushed some tags and have removed the Artifactory volume that contained them. To fix this, just remove the tags
git tag -l | xargs -n 1 git push --delete origin
-
by default we assume that you have jdk with id
jdk8
configured -
if you want a different one just override
JDK_VERSION
env var and point to the proper one
Tip
|
The docker image comes in with Java installed at /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64 .
You can go to Global Tools and create a JDK with jdk8 id and JAVA_HOME
pointing to /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64
|
To change the default one just follow these steps:
And that’s it!
When you get sth like this:
19:01:44 stderr: remote: Invalid username or password.
19:01:44 fatal: Authentication failed for 'https://github.com/marcingrzejszczak/github-webhook/'
19:01:44
19:01:44 at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1740)
19:01:44 at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1476)
19:01:44 at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:63)
19:01:44 at org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$8.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1816)
19:01:44 at hudson.plugins.git.GitPublisher.perform(GitPublisher.java:295)
19:01:44 at hudson.tasks.BuildStepMonitor$3.perform(BuildStepMonitor.java:45)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.perform(AbstractBuild.java:779)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:720)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.Build$BuildExecution.post2(Build.java:185)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.post(AbstractBuild.java:665)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1745)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:98)
19:01:44 at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:404)
most likely you’ve passed a wrong password. Check the credentials section on how to update your credentials.
If you receive a similar exception:
20:26:18 API endpoint: https://api.local.pcfdev.io (API version: 2.58.0)
20:26:18 User: user
20:26:18 Org: pcfdev-org
20:26:18 Space: No space targeted, use 'cf target -s SPACE'
20:26:18 FAILED
20:26:18 Error finding space pcfdev-test
20:26:18 Space pcfdev-test not found
It means that you’ve forgotten to create the spaces in your PCF Dev installation.
If you play around with Jenkins / Concourse you might end up with the routes occupied
Using route github-webhook-test.local.pcfdev.io
Binding github-webhook-test.local.pcfdev.io to github-webhook...
FAILED
The route github-webhook-test.local.pcfdev.io is already in use.
Just delete the routes
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-webhook-test
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-eureka-test
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n stubrunner-test
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-webhook-stage
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-eureka-stage
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-webhook-prod
yes | cf delete-route local.pcfdev.io -n github-eureka-prod
You can also execute the ./tools/pcfdev-helper.sh delete-routes
Most likely you’ve forgotten to update your local settings.xml
with the Artifactory’s
setup. Check out this section of the docs and update your settings.xml
.
In some cases it may be required that when performing a release that the artifacts be signed
before pushing them to the repository.
To do this you will need to import your GPG keys into the Docker image running Jenkins.
This can be done by placing a file called public.key
containing your public key
and a file called private.key
containing your private key in the seed
directory.
These keys will be imported by the init.groovy
script that is run when Jenkins starts.
Check out the tutorial. Provide the link to this repository in your Jenkins installation.
Warning
|
Remember that views can be overridden that’s why the suggestion is to contain in one script all the logic needed to build a view
for a single project (check out that spring_cloud_views.groovy is building all the spring-cloud views).
|
When doing a release you also need to push a Docker image to Dockerhub.
From the project root, run the following commands replacing <version>
with the
version of the release.
docker login
docker build -t springcloud/spring-cloud-pipeline-jenkins:<version> ./jenkins
docker push springcloud/spring-cloud-pipeline-jenkins:<version>