[WIP] Solidity Implementation of mvs_manager.cairo#20
Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoupgrade/scarb-2.11.4from
Closed
[WIP] Solidity Implementation of mvs_manager.cairo#20Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoupgrade/scarb-2.11.4from
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intoupgrade/scarb-2.11.4from
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coding agent has begun work on Solidity Implementation of mvs_manager.cairo and will replace this description as work progresses.
See problem context
TITLE: Solidity Implementation of mvs_manager.cairo
USER INTENT: The user aims to create a Solidity version of the
mvs_manager.cairofile, ensuring it supports multiple extensions and adheres to specific operational requirements.TASK DESCRIPTION: The user requires the development of a Solidity contract located in
solidity/srcthat functions as an ERC4626 compatible vault. This contract should manage multipleIMVSSubExtensioncontracts, such asLeverageVault.sol. The total assets should be calculated as the balance of the manager contract plus the total assets of each extension, all denominated in the manager's asset. The contract should include a rebalance function for complex push/pull operations, which should be configurable rather than hardcoded.EXISTING: The user has specified the repository as
strkfarm-coreand outlined the requirements for the Solidity implementation of the manager contract.PENDING: The user is awaiting the creation of the Solidity contract that meets the outlined specifications, particularly focusing on the ERC4626 compatibility and the configurable rebalance operations.
CODE STATE:
RELEVANT CODE/DOCUMENTATION SNIPPETS:
OTHER NOTES: The user has emphasized the importance of allowing configurable operations for the rebalance function, indicating a preference for flexibility in the contract's functionality.