Skip to content

vid to did #73

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

vid to did #73

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

andorsk
Copy link
Collaborator

@andorsk andorsk commented Oct 23, 2024

Proposal: Update Specification from VID to DID

This PR proposes changing the specification from being VID-based to DID-based. VIDs lack a clear, standardized method for resolution, making practical interoperability challenging for implementors. To be effective, this specification must be actionable.

DIDs, on the other hand, have a well-defined specification provided at https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/, which offers clear guidelines for compliance.

While VIDs are defined conceptually here: https://trustoverip.github.io/ctwg-main-glossary/#term:verifiable-identifier, they do not have a consistent resolution mechanism, which varies by VID type and remains vaguely specified.

For non-native based DID methods, such as x509s, one can leverage hybrid methods such as High Assurance DID to put the VID into a DID form which has a proper resolution mechanism.

This proposal replaces all VID references to DIDs.

@andorsk andorsk linked an issue Nov 7, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@andorsk andorsk closed this Mar 13, 2025
@andorsk andorsk reopened this Mar 13, 2025
@andorsk andorsk closed this Mar 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Difference between VID methods and DID methods?
2 participants