Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Update OpenAPI Specification with New Endpoints and Schema Modifications #89

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Nov 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new endpoints for querying deployment logs, retrieving available voices, and managing API tokens.
  • Updated Features
    • Enhanced existing endpoints with new operations for account management and refined response schemas.
  • Security Improvements
    • Standardized authentication across multiple endpoints using the Bearer scheme.

These updates improve API functionality and user access to deployment and account data.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes to the OpenAPI specification for the DeepApi include the introduction of several new endpoints, updates to existing endpoints, and modifications to response schemas. New endpoints allow for querying deployment logs, retrieving available voices, and managing API tokens. Existing endpoints have been expanded with additional operations and refined parameter requirements, while response schemas have been updated to reflect new data structures. Security definitions have also been standardized to enhance authentication consistency across the API.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml - Added endpoints: /v1/deployment_logs/query, /v1/voices, /v1/api-tokens
- Updated endpoints: /lora-model (response schema), /v1/me (added patch and delete operations)
- Added parameters and request bodies for several endpoints, including /payment/* endpoints
- Standardized security definitions to use Bearer scheme

Poem

In the meadow where APIs play,
New paths are forged, come what may.
With voices and tokens, oh what a sight,
Deployment logs dancing in the light.
A rabbit hops, with joy and glee,
Celebrating changes, wild and free! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge November 22, 2024 01:23
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 92acb1f into main Nov 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Update OpenAPI Specification with New Endpoints and Schema Modifications Nov 22, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (3)

Line range hint 1-1: Consolidate security schemes

The API specification defines two identical bearer token security schemes (HTTPBearer and Bearer). This redundancy could lead to confusion in API client implementations.

Consider consolidating into a single security scheme:

  securitySchemes:
-   HTTPBearer:
-     type: http
-     scheme: bearer
    Bearer:
      type: http
      scheme: bearer

Then update all endpoint security references to use the single scheme consistently.


Line range hint 1-1: Consider removing the deprecated list endpoint

The API has two identical endpoints for listing deployments:

  • /deploy/list/ (deprecated)
  • /deploy/list (active)

Having duplicate endpoints increases maintenance overhead and could confuse API consumers.

Consider:

  1. Adding a sunset date for the deprecated endpoint
  2. Implementing a redirect from the deprecated endpoint to the new one
  3. Planning for eventual removal of the deprecated endpoint

Line range hint 1-1: Enhance API documentation

While the documentation is generally comprehensive, there are opportunities for improvement:

  1. Add descriptions for schema properties where missing
  2. Provide more comprehensive response examples
  3. Include rate limiting details in endpoint descriptions

Consider enhancing documentation for better API usability and understanding.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6974d10 and 295da3f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.DeepInfraApi.UploadLoraModel.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.IDeepInfraApi.UploadLoraModel.g.cs is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml (1)

817-817: Verify the impact of response schema change

The response schema for /lora-model POST endpoint has been changed from ModelOut to DeploymentOut. While this change aligns with deployment-focused behavior, it's a breaking change that requires careful consideration.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the DeploymentOut schema and its relationship with the LoRA model endpoint.


Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:

Schema change from ModelOut to DeploymentOut is appropriate

The change in response schema for /lora-model endpoint from ModelOut to DeploymentOut is correct and well-aligned with the endpoint's behavior. The DeploymentOut schema includes essential deployment-related fields like deploy_id, status, and fail_reason, which are crucial for tracking the LoRA model upload and deployment process. The generated client code in DeepInfraApi.UploadLoraModel.g.cs already uses the DeploymentOut return type, indicating this is an intentional design choice to provide deployment status information to API consumers.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usages of the /lora-model endpoint to identify potential impacts
# Look for API client implementations that might be affected by the schema change

# Search for lora-model endpoint usage in code
rg -l "lora-model" 

# Search for ModelOut schema references
rg "ModelOut" 

Length of output: 9521


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the schema definitions and their relationships
rg -A 20 "DeploymentOut:" src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml

# Check the /lora-model endpoint definition for context
rg -A 10 "/lora-model:" src/libs/DeepInfra/openapi.yaml

# Check if there are any generated client files for UploadLoraModel
cat src/libs/DeepInfra/Generated/DeepInfra.DeepInfraApi.UploadLoraModel.g.cs

Length of output: 12291

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant