Update docs, fix some typos and add links

demo/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/tunjid/mutator/demo/sections/1_State_Production_With_Flows.kt

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ private val headingMarkdown = """
 private val introMarkdown = """
 By [Adetunji Dahunsi](https://twitter.com/Tunji_D).
 
-State is what is. A declaration of things known at a certain point in time. As time passes however, state changes as data sources backing the state are updated and events happen. In mobile apps this presents a challenge; defining a convenient and concise means to produce state over time.
+State is what it is. A declaration of things known at a certain point in time. As time passes however, state changes as data sources backing the state are updated and events happen. In mobile apps this presents a challenge; defining a convenient and concise means to produce state over time.
 
 This page is a [Jetpack Compose](https://developer.android.com/jetpack/compose?gclid=Cj0KCQjwzqSWBhDPARIsAK38LY-nnY_1sTpVvpENJZD5ek-tE18e3MvzE1hXlILdw7uYx1Y47zsvcXkaAlGJEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds) for [web](https://compose-web.ui.pages.jetbrains.team/) powered interactive experiment that highlights various ways of producing state with a [Flow](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/flow.html). At the end of it, you should have a mental framework to help choose a state production pipeline that is most beneficial to your use cases.
 
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ Producing state is at its core, is nothing more than consolidating sources of ch
 
 While the tenets of UDF are simple, there's a bit more to implementing it properly especially with `Flows`. Let's start simple. In the following we have a snail along a track. The snail has the following properties:
 
-* It's progress along the track.
-* It's color.
+* Its progress along the track.
+* Its color.
 
 An easy way to represent the state production pipeline for the snail is with a single `MutableStateFlow`: 
 """.trimIndent()

demo/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/tunjid/mutator/demo/sections/4_Merging.kt

@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ To produce state then, we simply have to start with an initial state, and increm
 Expressing this in code with `Flows` is very concise and requires just two operators:
 
 
-* `merge`: Used to merge all sources of `Mutation<State>` (Δstate) into a single stream
-* `scan`: Used to reduce the stream of `Mutation<State>` into the state being produced.
+* [`merge`](https://kotlinlang.org/api/kotlinx.coroutines/kotlinx-coroutines-core/kotlinx.coroutines.flow/merge.html): Used to merge all sources of `Mutation<State>` (Δstate) into a single stream
+* [`scan`](https://kotlinlang.org/api/kotlinx.coroutines/kotlinx-coroutines-core/kotlinx.coroutines.flow/scan.html): Used to reduce the stream of `Mutation<State>` into the state being produced.
 
 In our snail example, we can express the same state production pipeline with user actions as:    
 """.trimIndent()
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ class Snail5StateHolder(
         speedChanges,
         changeEvents,
     )
-        .scan(Snail5State()) { state, mutation -> mutation(state) }
+        .scan(Snail5State()) { startState, mutation -> mutation(startState) }
         .stateIn(...)
 
     fun setSnailColor(index: Int) {
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ It however brings the following advantages:
 
 The switch to `MutableSharedFlow` from `MutableStateFlow` for propagating user actions is because `StateFlow` conflates emissions. If two separate methods attempted to use the same `MutableStateFlow` to emit a `Mutation` of state, the `StateFlow` may only emit the latest `Mutation`. That is `MutableStateFlow` does not guarantee that every update to its `value` property is seen by its collectors.
 
-`MutableSharedFlow` on the other hand has an `emit` method which suspends until the `Mutation` is delivered. This means that multiple coroutines can be launched across several method invocations and call `emit` on the same `MutableShared` `Flow` and none of them will cancel out the other. The order in which they are applied also don't matter as `Mutation` instances just describe changes to state; they are designed to be independent.
+`MutableSharedFlow` on the other hand has an `emit` method which suspends until the `Mutation` is delivered. This means that multiple coroutines can be launched across several method invocations and call `emit` on the same `MutableShared` `Flow` and none of them will cancel out the other. The order in which they are applied also doesn't matter as `Mutation` instances just describe changes to state; they are designed to be independent.
 
 """.trimIndent()
 
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Drag the snail to place it anywhere on its track. Also, try to hold it in place
 private val nineMarkdown = """
 That is, we can simply introduce a state change to the `progress` property of the state despite the `progessChanges` flow also contributing to a change of the same property. This is something that would be rather difficult with the `combine` approach. This is because the combine approach only lets you set state properties of state to create new state. The `merge` approach instead lets you `mutate` or change properties of state and apply them to the existing state.  
 
-Furthermore both `setSnailColor` and `setProgress` contribute their changes to state using the same  `MutableSharedFlow`: `changeEvents`. This approach scales well because no mater how many methods are added that change the `State` from user events, they don't need any more variables to be declared in the state holder class. 
+Furthermore both `setSnailColor` and `setProgress` contribute their changes to state using the same  `MutableSharedFlow`: `changeEvents`. This approach scales well because no matter how many methods are added that change the `State` from user events, they don't need any more variables to be declared in the state holder class.
 """.trimIndent()
 
 private val tenMarkdown = """

demo/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/tunjid/mutator/demo/sections/5_Formalizing.kt

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ private val twoCode = """
 fun <State: Any> CoroutineScope.stateFlowProducer(
     initialState: State,
     started: SharingStarted = SharingStarted.WhileSubscribed(),
-    mutationFlows: List<Flow<Mutation<State>>>
+    inputs: List<Flow<Mutation<State>>>
 ) : StateFlowProducer<State>
 """.trimIndent()
 
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ class Snail7StateHolder(
     private val stateProducer = scope.stateFlowProducer(
         initialState = Snail7State(),
         started = SharingStarted.WhileSubscribed(),
-        mutationFlows = listOf(
+        inputs = listOf(
             speedChanges,
             progressChanges,
         )

demo/src/commonMain/kotlin/com/tunjid/mutator/demo/sections/7_Conflict_Resolution.kt

@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ class Snail11StateHolder(
     private val mutator = scope.actionStateFlowProducer<Action, Snail11State>(
         initialState = Snail11State(),
         started = SharingStarted.WhileSubscribed(),
-        mutationFlows = listOf(
+        inputs = listOf(
             speedChanges,
             progressChanges
         ),
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ private val nineMarkdown = """
 
 In the above, all there are two sources of state `Mutation`s:
 
-* Data sources in the `mutationFlows` argument; defined as `Flow<Mutation<State>>`
+* Data sources in the `inputs` argument; defined as `Flow<Mutation<State>>`
 * User events in the `actionTransform` argument; defined as `(Flow<Action>) -> Flow<Mutation<State>>`
 
 Crucially the `actionTransform` takes a `Flow` of all `Action` instances, splits them out into individual `Flow`s for each `Action`, and finally applies `Flow` transformations to each `Action` `Flow` to turn them into `Flow<Mutation<State>>`:

readme.md

@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ class SnailStateHolder(
     private val stateProducer = scope.stateFlowProducer(
         initialState = Snail7State(),
         started = SharingStarted.WhileSubscribed(),
-        mutationFlows = listOf(
+        inputs = listOf(
             speedChanges,
             progressChanges,
         )