Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional eval7 baselines #1959

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 8 additions & 8 deletions docs/baseline_results/carla_mot_results.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,18 +2,18 @@

This is the baseline evaluation for the multi-object tracking scenario. For single-object tracking, see [carla_video_tracking_results.md](../baseline_results/carla_video_tracking_results.md).

For [dev data](https://github.com/twosixlabs/armory/blob/master/armory/data/adversarial/carla_mot_dev.py), results obtained using Armory v0.16.1.
[Test](https://github.com/twosixlabs/armory/blob/master/armory/data/adversarial/carla_mot_test.py) results obtained using Armory v0.17.2.
Results obtained using Armory v0.18.0.



| Data | Defended | Attack | Attack Parameters | Benign DetA / AssA / HOTA | Adversarial DetA / AssA / HOTA | Test Size |
|------|----------|-------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------------|-----------|
| Dev | no | Adversarial Patch | step_size=0.02, max_iter=100 | 0.49 / 0.62 / 0.55 | 0.18 / 0.57 / 0.32 | 20 |
| Dev | no | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.49 / 0.62 / 0.55 | 0.39 / 0.59 / 0.48 | 20 |
| Dev | yes | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.34 / 0.53 / 0.42 | 0.24 / 0.51 / 0.34 | 20 |
| Test | no | Adversarial Patch | step_size=0.02, max_iter=100 | 0.43 / 0.51 / 0.46 | 0.19 / 0.45 / 0.29 | 10 |
| Test | no | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.43 / 0.51 / 0.46 | 0.31 / 0.46 / 0.37 | 10 |
| Test | yes | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.32 / 0.45 / 0.38 | 0.22 / 0.41 / 0.30 | 10 |
| Dev | no | Adversarial Patch | step_size=0.02, max_iter=100 | 0.55 / 0.64 / 0.59 | 0.15 / 0.58 / 0.29 | 20 |
| Dev | no | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.55 / 0.64 / 0.59 | 0.42 / 0.61 / 0.50 | 20 |
| Dev | yes | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.36 / 0.53 / 0.44 | 0.25 / 0.49 / 0.35 | 20 |
| Test | no | Adversarial Patch | step_size=0.02, max_iter=100 | 0.45 / 0.55 / 0.49 | 0.25 / 0.47 / 0.35 | 10 |
| Test | no | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.45 / 0.55 / 0.49 | 0.36 / 0.49 / 0.41 | 10 |
| Test | yes | Robust DPatch | step_size=0.002, max_iter=1000 | 0.31 / 0.44 / 0.37 | 0.22 / 0.39 / 0.29 | 10 |

Defended results not available for Adversarial Patch attack because JPEG Compression defense is not implemented in PyTorch and so is not fully differentiable.
Note that Robust DPatch is considerably slower than Adversarial Patch.
Expand Down
Loading