-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(main): release 1.4.0 #34
chore(main): release 1.4.0 #34
Conversation
@gentlementlegen So we should:
Correct? |
@rndquu No need to merge |
But this way the |
@rndquu We can merge it back, it is not really important as the version is based on the conventional commit comments and not on the tags of the branch / repo nor the package version. But to keep it in sync we can do so. |
It's important for a developer to keep versions in sync. When you What is the expected flow of using This PR introduces a different flow:
I'm trying to find out what approach we should use for all of the ubiquity repositories. |
The version should never be manually changed that's why I believed it wouldn't matter (rest of the code is in sync). The difference in version happens because we use Current flow within this PR is:
|
How does the |
Well ideally our main branch should be the release branch. But as you said, let's merge back main into develop in the meantime! |
So the flow is:
|
Correct. Also note that the deployment of the package happens after step 3 is completed. |
π€ Created releases:
|
π€ I have created a release beep boop
1.4.0 (2024-07-08)
β BREAKING CHANGES
Features
Bug Fixes
Miscellaneous Chores
This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.