Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Improve README with clarity, structure, and technology details #168

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SobaSkee
Copy link
Contributor

This update improves the OSC Jukebox React App README by enhancing clarity, organization, and completeness. The document now features more structured sections, including a detailed "Technology Used" segment highlighting React, Vite, Tailwind CSS, Docker, MongoDB, Kafka, and NGINX. These additions provide better context for both new contributors and users exploring the project.

Additionally, the README now includes more intuitive quick-start instructions, clearer explanations of environments and routes. This creates a smooth onboarding experience and empowers beginner contributors to engage more effectively with the project.

This update improves the OSC Jukebox React App README by enhancing clarity, organization, and completeness. The document now features more structured sections, including a detailed "Technology Used" segment highlighting React, Vite, Tailwind CSS, Docker, MongoDB, Kafka, and NGINX. These additions provide better context for both new contributors and users exploring the project.

Additionally, the README now includes more intuitive quick-start instructions, clearer explanations of environments and routes. This creates a smooth onboarding experience and empowers beginner contributors to engage more effectively with the project.
@JonathanHooth
Copy link
Collaborator

@SobaSkee Thank you for the effort in improving the README! The restructuring definitely enhances clarity and organization, making it more user-friendly for new contributors.

However, I noticed that some technologies mentioned—such as Tailwind CSS and MongoDB—are not actually used in this project. To maintain accuracy, these should either be removed or replaced with the correct technologies used in the stack.

Could you update the README to reflect only the tools that are actually part of the project? Once adjusted, we can move forward with merging this! Let me know if you need any clarifications. 🚀

Tailwind CSS was not actually used in this project, but Sass is used so I have changed it to that.
@SobaSkee
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have went ahead and updated the CSS technology and removed MongoDB.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants