Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define "option resolution" and require order to be insignificant #920

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2024

Conversation

aphillips
Copy link
Member

This addresses concerns raised in #903

  • define option resolution as a term
  • require that option order is not significant

I was tempted to define the term resolved options, but held back.

This addresses concerns raised in #903 

- define `option resolution` as a term
- require that option order is not significant

I was tempted to define the term `resolved options`, but held back.
@aphillips aphillips requested review from eemeli and macchiati October 28, 2024 15:29
@aphillips aphillips added normative Issue affects normative text in the specification Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference formatting LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate labels Oct 28, 2024
@aphillips aphillips merged commit db82a8b into main Oct 28, 2024
1 check passed
@aphillips aphillips deleted the aphillips-option-resolution branch October 28, 2024 19:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Agenda+ Requested for upcoming teleconference formatting LDML46.1 MF2.0 Draft Candidate normative Issue affects normative text in the specification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants