Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to v2 (major) #35

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 8, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@vitest/coverage-v8 (source) ^1.5.0 -> ^2.1.5 age adoption passing confidence
vitest (source) ^1.5.0 -> ^2.1.5 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-v8)

v2.1.5

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.3

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.2

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.1

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.1.0

Compare Source

This release makes another big change to the Browser Mode by introducing locators API:

test('renders blog posts', async () => {
  const screen = page.render(<Blog />)

  await expect.element(screen.getByRole('heading', { name: 'Blog' })).toBeInTheDocument()

  const [firstPost] = screen.getByRole('listitem').all()

  await firstPost.getByRole('button', { name: 'Delete' }).click()

  expect(screen.getByRole('listitem').all()).toHaveLength(3)
})

You can use either vitest-browser-vue, vitest-browser-svelte or vitest-browser-react to render components and make assertions using locators. Locators are also available on the page object from @vitest/browser/context.

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.0.5

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.0.4

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub

v2.0.3

Compare Source

   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes
    [View changes on GitHub](https:

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from 6a0eb60 to 26e8cf1 Compare July 15, 2024 12:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch from 26e8cf1 to 662396e Compare July 22, 2024 11:27
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from 16d0b7b to 7f7045c Compare August 4, 2024 01:50
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from d4d5192 to f976fb5 Compare September 13, 2024 15:59
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch from f976fb5 to 4f753c3 Compare October 2, 2024 17:09
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch from 4f753c3 to 9a96a19 Compare October 14, 2024 11:24
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch from 9a96a19 to 9204a20 Compare October 28, 2024 14:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-vitest-monorepo branch from 9204a20 to 6d1b221 Compare November 13, 2024 16:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants