Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/improve comment #8

Closed
wants to merge 45 commits into from
Closed

Feat/improve comment #8

wants to merge 45 commits into from

Conversation

utsmannn
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

… action, enhancing clarity and maintainability.
…de issue read for PR check, introduce logic to determine existence of PR via branch name, set PR number as output for action.
…fining PR existence logic for enhanced workflow
…onditional execution; switch to gh cli for PR number retrieval.
…nd PR number step, adjust permissions for enhanced security.
…t the action directory, and removed the display of `review.py` content for better debugging.
…directory, remove redundant path configuration, improving workflow clarity and maintainability.
… configuration during checkout and listing all files for improved clarity and maintainability.
…path display, and `review.py` content output for improved action troubleshooting.
…ml and review.py to src, updating workflow and action paths.
…y`, enhancing maintainability by removing the relative path.
…tputs, added retry mechanisms, input sanitization, and line-specific comments with rate limiting.
…tly parse from GITHUB_REF, enhancing robustness and maintainability.
…ommit object and adjusted line position to match the diff accurately.
…comments, enhancing review functionality by enabling line-specific, multi-comment capabilities, and removed deprecated `create_review_comment`.
…ining review creation with a single API call, and adjusting payload structure for efficient processing.
…fset adjustments, ensuring correct line positioning within diffs and adding original line info to the body.
…model response dict, simplifying JSON processing.
…ction of Gemini model, and modified `review.py` to parse JSON response for improved structure and validation, including line number handling.
…ligning with diff patterns to ensure accurate comment placement.
…ed redundant validation and line defaulting for simplified processing of structured review outputs.
… and simplified structured JSON handling, improving review output
… analysis, including Git interaction for comprehensive code reviews.
… interaction in code review process, enabling advanced diff analysis and code examination.
…ncy; implement line number lookup from file content for precise comment placement.
…tespace for accuracy, enhancing comment placement and file read robustness.
…tespace for improved accuracy, enhancing robustness in file reads and comment placements.
…iffs via GitHub API, enabling more detailed review.
…s, and refine line matching by normalizing whitespace for increased accuracy in file reads and comment placements.
… year calculation with current year for code review.
… and overall diffs, enhancing review logic for both, with refined whitespace normalization for improved line matching accuracy.
…ng action configuration; adjusted workflow to simplify input parameters.
…lifying review process; improved comment posting to avoid duplicates by checking file path and line number.
…iciency, while refining diff processing and comment posting.
…s and enhance comment posting to avoid duplication.
…umbers, streamlined payload, and eliminated redundant issue comments.
…hecking last processed commit SHA, use `create_review` with accurate line numbers, and streamline payload for efficiency.
…, avoid duplicates via review comments, and enhance diff processing for line number retrieval.
Copy link

📝 AI Code Review Report

Overall, the code needs some improvements in terms of security and maintainability. Implementing proper error handling for file operations and user input validation is crucial. Replace the magic numbers with named constants, and add type hints where necessary. Avoid using eval() with user input or use appropriate sanitization or validation checks.

@utsmannn utsmannn closed this Jan 25, 2025
@utsmannn utsmannn deleted the feat/improve_comment branch January 25, 2025 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant