004 episode 2 draft

[wbaccinelli]

Resolves: #4

At the moment, the future of v6 needs still to be added.

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/vantage6/vantage6-workshop/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-17

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 2-understanding-v6.md (new)                  | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 config.yaml                                  | 157 +++++++++++------------
 fig/algorithm_central_and_subtasks.png (new) | Bin 0 -> 47664 bytes
 fig/algorithm_workflow.png (new)             | Bin 0 -> 523212 bytes
 fig/schema_exercise.png (new)                | Bin 0 -> 412812 bytes
 fig/v6_basic_schema.png (new)                | Bin 0 -> 64203 bytes
 fig/v6_basic_schema.svg (new)                |   1 +
 md5sum.txt                                   |   3 +-
 8 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-05-14 14:26:05 +0000

[frankcorneliusmartin]

Hi Walter, thanks for the work so far. A few general comments:

• Please expand v6 to vantage6
• I added some details that might clutter the story, so please feel free to discuss them
• Should we also add links to the documentation where they can find more in depth information?

I think the challenge you made is great =]. However we should maybe consider use a more numeric example as equations might complicate it? / Distract from the exercise goal?

I also would like to add a section / excersize on policy management. For example I want them to understand that certain security measures are imposed at the node and some of them at the server.

[frankcorneliusmartin]

Add a newline after this secion. Now the bulletpoints do not render as a list

[wbaccinelli]

I see the this rendered correctly, also when the lesson is built

[frankcorneliusmartin]

I think i pushed the enter when I added the future section

[frankcorneliusmartin]

Change the title to:

vantage6 basics

or something similar

[frankcorneliusmartin]

Maybe change to

Infrastructure components

[frankcorneliusmartin]

Ok so now I've red a little further. I would restructure this section a little bit as now it seems to repeat itself. I propose to remove the "The vantage 6 infrastructure components" level, so to have the following structure:

Infrastructure components

Server

Data Station

Client

[wbaccinelli]

Yes, I think you're right. I will merge the two sections in one.

[frankcorneliusmartin]

Not sure if we want to mention these. I think it is good to mention them briefly, even though the users do not really interact with them.

Suggested change

	- **EduVPN instance**
	- **RabbitMQ**

[wbaccinelli]

Thanks a lot @frankcorneliusmartin! I should have solved the points you raised now :)