Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add resultsObserver to ScatterConn #16638

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rafer
Copy link
Contributor

@rafer rafer commented Aug 22, 2024

Description

Updates ScatterConn's ExecuteMultiShard and StreamExecuteMulti methods to accept a results observer parameter. These methods call resultsObserver#observe with every sqltypes.Result returned from the underlying shards. This makes it straightforward to add instrumentation that needs access to the individual results actually returned from the shards, not just the Result object returned to the client which may or may not include data from all the shard results

This PR adds the resultObserver, but it is set to a nullResultsObserver so it is effectively a no-op. Having this extensibility will make it much for downstream forks to add instrumentation as needed.

Related Issue(s)

closes #16481

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

None

rafer added 2 commits August 22, 2024 16:46
Updates ScatterConn's ExecuteMultiShard and StreamExecuteMulti methods
to accept a results observer parameter. These methods call
resultsObserver#observe with every sqltypes.Result object returned from
the underlying shards. This makes it straightforward to add
instrumentation that needs access to the individual results actually
returned from the shards, not just the Result object returned to the
client which may or may not include data from all the shards

This PR adds the resultObserver, but it is set to a nullResultsObserver
so it is effectively a no-op. Having this extensibility will make it
much easier for downstream forks to add instrumentation as needed.

Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Aug 22, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v21.0.0 milestone Aug 22, 2024
@rafer rafer removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Aug 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 76.00000% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.00%. Comparing base (feb845a) to head (5a8f060).
Report is 35 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
go/vt/vtgate/scatter_conn.go 69.23% 4 Missing ⚠️
go/vt/vtgate/vcursor_impl.go 71.42% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16638      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.98%   69.00%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1562     1564       +2     
  Lines      200697   202029    +1332     
==========================================
+ Hits       138446   139411     +965     
- Misses      62251    62618     +367     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

rafer and others added 6 commits August 23, 2024 14:52
Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
…ter-conn-results

Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
…ter-conn-results

Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <andres@planetscale.com>
Copy link
Member

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me too!

Signed-off-by: Rafer Hazen <rafer@ralua.com>
@frouioui frouioui merged commit 977b9a3 into main Aug 29, 2024
221 checks passed
@frouioui frouioui deleted the observe-scatter-conn-results branch August 29, 2024 16:38
Comment on lines +273 to +276
if innerqr != nil {
resultsObserver.observe(innerqr)
}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here it is given that innerqr will not be nil.
Just below, we append the result to the output result set as-sis without checking.

Comment on lines +76 to +78
resultsObserver interface {
observe(*sqltypes.Result)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this method not take in the shard information to track where this result set comes from?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Feature Request: Generalize result-level statistics aggregation
5 participants