-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid flaky topo concurrency test #17407
Merged
timvaillancourt
merged 9 commits into
vitessio:main
from
timvaillancourt:avoid-flaky-topo-concurrency-test
Jan 10, 2025
Merged
Avoid flaky topo concurrency test #17407
timvaillancourt
merged 9 commits into
vitessio:main
from
timvaillancourt:avoid-flaky-topo-concurrency-test
Jan 10, 2025
+90
−102
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
timvaillancourt
added
Type: Internal Cleanup
Type: Enhancement
Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Component: Topology
labels
Dec 19, 2024
Review ChecklistHello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request. General
Tests
Documentation
New flags
If a workflow is added or modified:
Backward compatibility
|
vitess-bot
bot
added
NeedsBackportReason
If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required
NeedsDescriptionUpdate
The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work
NeedsIssue
A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request
NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate
What it says
labels
Dec 19, 2024
timvaillancourt
removed
NeedsDescriptionUpdate
The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work
NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate
What it says
NeedsIssue
A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request
NeedsBackportReason
If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required
labels
Dec 19, 2024
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17407 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 67.66% 67.69% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 1584 1584
Lines 254360 254505 +145
==========================================
+ Hits 172116 172288 +172
+ Misses 82244 82217 -27 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
mattlord
approved these changes
Dec 20, 2024
deepthi
approved these changes
Jan 10, 2025
Signed-off-by: Tim Vaillancourt <tim@timvaillancourt.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Topology
Type: Enhancement
Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Type: Internal Cleanup
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR avoids flakiness in the
TestStatsConnTopoListDir
andTestStatsConnTopoGet
unit tests ofgo/vt/topo
by ensuring the semaphore we hold to test semaphore-wait stats is acquired before testing aListDir
orGet
I don't see cases of this flakiness on our fork or upstream, but I think flakiness possible in extreme cases
Also, test logic was updated to use
require.Equal
,require.(No)Error
andrequire.(Not)Zero
Related Issue(s)
Checklist
Deployment Notes