Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade sigs.k8s.io/controller-tools and KUBE_VERSION #17889

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

frouioui
Copy link
Member

@frouioui frouioui commented Mar 3, 2025

Description

This PR is a follow-up of the work done in planetscale/vitess-operator#670. The controller tool package was upgraded to a newer version, along with the default K8S version, leading to changes in the example manifest we generate.

frouioui added 2 commits March 3, 2025 11:07
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Mar 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Mar 3, 2025
@frouioui frouioui removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Mar 3, 2025
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
@frouioui
Copy link
Member Author

frouioui commented Mar 3, 2025

Adding Do Not Merge until the original PR on the vitess-operator repo is merged.

@frouioui frouioui merged commit 2952ac5 into vitessio:main Mar 3, 2025
102 of 103 checks passed
@frouioui frouioui deleted the update-operator-manifest branch March 3, 2025 20:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants