FEAT: Improve coverage from 0 to 100% for pkg/api

[Sagar-6203620715]

Description

Added test files, coverage extended to 100% from 0%.

• pkg/api/errors_test.go

Related Issue

Partially fixes #88

Type of Change

• Test addition/update

Changes Made

Added test for two files in pkg/api

Testing

• Unit tests added/updated
• Integration tests pass

[volcano-sh-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign yaozengzeng for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Sagar-6203620715, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the reliability of the pkg/api package by introducing a complete suite of unit tests for its error handling utilities. The new tests ensure that API errors are correctly generated, classified, and contain the expected details, thereby improving the overall robustness of the API layer.

Highlights

• New Test File Added: Introduced pkg/api/errors_test.go to provide comprehensive unit tests for the error handling functions within the pkg/api package.
• Improved Test Coverage: Increased the test coverage for the pkg/api package from 0% to 100% by thoroughly testing error creation and classification logic.
• Error Handling Validation: Validated the correct behavior and structure of various API error types, including NotFound, ServiceUnavailable, and InternalError, ensuring they conform to Kubernetes API error standards.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds comprehensive test coverage for the pkg/api/errors.go file, which is a great improvement. The tests are well-structured, using table-driven approaches for various cases. I've found a couple of areas for improvement: one is a bug in a test case that incorrectly expects a panic, and the other is the presence of redundant tests that could be removed to improve maintainability. Overall, great work on increasing the test coverage.

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@ecea52a). Learn more about missing BASE report.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #160   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   34.42%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       29           
  Lines           ?     2533           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      872           
  Misses          ?     1538           
  Partials        ?      123           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	34.42% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Sagar-6203620715]

/cc @hzxuzhonghu