Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FragmentedSampleReader] restore codechandler GetInformation #1722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

CastagnaIT
Copy link
Collaborator

@CastagnaIT CastagnaIT commented Nov 8, 2024

Description

Motivation and context

removed by mistake from #1720

How has this been tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Clean up (non-breaking change which removes non-working, unmaintained functionality)
  • Improvement (non-breaking change which improves existing functionality)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing functionality to change)
  • Cosmetic change (non-breaking change that doesn't touch code)
  • None of the above (please explain below)

Checklist:

  • I have read the Contributing document
  • My code follows the Code Guidelines of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Wiki documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

@CastagnaIT CastagnaIT added Type: Fix non-breaking change which fixes an issue v22 Piers labels Nov 8, 2024
@CastagnaIT
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Uukrull try to see if this will fix your stream

@Uukrull
Copy link

Uukrull commented Nov 8, 2024

Yes, indeed. Many thanks!

@CastagnaIT CastagnaIT merged commit c17dae9 into xbmc:Piers Nov 8, 2024
10 checks passed
@CastagnaIT CastagnaIT deleted the restore_getinfo branch November 8, 2024 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Fix non-breaking change which fixes an issue v22 Piers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants