-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: rename import velite config to avoid naming conflicts #249
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThe PR renames the imported velite config variable to avoid potential naming conflicts. The implementation changes the import name from 'config' to '__vc' in the type definitions, and updates corresponding test assertions to account for the change in string length due to the variable renaming. Class diagram for updated import namingclassDiagram
class Output {
+outputEntry(dest: string, format: Output['format'], configPath: string)
}
class TypeDefinitions {
-config
+__vc
+Collections: typeof __vc.collections
}
Output --> TypeDefinitions : uses
note for TypeDefinitions "Renamed import from 'config' to '__vc' to avoid naming conflicts."
File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to type imports and references within the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @zce - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/basic.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-31
: Consider adding a test case for the naming conflict scenario.While this test verifies the build output integrity, it would be valuable to add a specific test case that ensures the naming conflict (issue #248) is properly prevented. This would help prevent regression and document the expected behavior.
Would you like me to help create a test case that verifies the proper handling of collections named 'config'?
src/output.ts (1)
40-41
: Consider documenting the naming convention.While the fix is correct, it would be helpful to document why
__vc
was chosen as the import name, either in the code or in the project's documentation, to prevent future confusion.Consider adding a comment explaining the naming convention:
+// Using __vc prefix to avoid conflicts with collection names const dts: string[] = [`import type __vc from '${configModPath}'\n`] dts.push('type Collections = typeof __vc.collections\n')
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/output.ts
(1 hunks)test/basic.ts
(1 hunks)test/nextjs.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/basic.ts (1)
15-15
: LGTM! The updated length reflects the import rename.
The reduction in length from 636 to 632 (4 characters) aligns perfectly with the change from 'config' to '__vc' in the type imports.
test/nextjs.ts (1)
14-14
: LGTM! The updated length assertion correctly reflects the import rename change.
The reduction in expected length (636 -> 632) aligns with the PR's objective of renaming the import from 'config' to '__vc'.
Let's verify the consistency with basic.ts test:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Length assertion is consistent across test files
The expected length of 632 is correctly synchronized between both test/nextjs.ts and test/basic.ts, confirming the consistent behavior of the import rename change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that both test files have the same expected length for dts output
# Test: Check if basic.ts has the same expected length
rg "dts.length, 632" test/basic.ts
Length of output: 96
const dts: string[] = [`import type __vc from '${configModPath}'\n`] | ||
dts.push('type Collections = typeof __vc.collections\n') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The rename from config
to __vc
is correctly implemented in the source code
The only remaining reference to import config from '../velite.config'
is in the documentation example which needs to be updated to reflect the new changes. The actual implementation in the source code has been properly updated to use __vc
to prevent naming conflicts.
- Documentation needs update in
docs/guide/using-collections.md
to reflect the new import name
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The rename effectively addresses the naming conflict.
The change from config
to __vc
for the type import prevents potential naming conflicts when collections are named config
, addressing issue #248.
Let's verify that this change effectively prevents the naming conflict:
Let me gather more information to verify if the remaining reference is just in documentation or if there are any actual code references we need to address.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the fix prevents naming conflicts with 'config' collection
# Test 1: Check if there are any remaining references to the old import name
rg "import.*config.*from.*velite\.config"
# Test 2: Verify the generated declaration file structure
ast-grep --pattern $'import type __vc from'
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other references to 'config' imports in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg -t ts -t js "import.*config.*from.*velite\.config"
# Check the actual content of the docs file to understand the context
cat "docs/guide/using-collections.md"
# Look for any type declarations using 'config'
ast-grep --pattern $'type $_ = typeof config'
Length of output: 6145
fix #248
Summary by Sourcery
Rename the import of the velite config to '__vc' to avoid naming conflicts and update related test assertions.
Bug Fixes:
Tests:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores