Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rename import velite config to avoid naming conflicts #249

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

zce
Copy link
Owner

@zce zce commented Oct 31, 2024

fix #248

Summary by Sourcery

Rename the import of the velite config to '__vc' to avoid naming conflicts and update related test assertions.

Bug Fixes:

  • Resolve naming conflicts by renaming the import of the velite config to '__vc'.

Tests:

  • Update test assertions to reflect the new length of the 'dts' output after renaming the import.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected the expected length of the TypeScript definition file output in tests, from 636 to 632, ensuring accurate validation of generated files.
  • Chores

    • Updated type references in the output generation process to improve clarity and maintainability without altering existing functionality.
    • Enhanced documentation for using collections, reflecting changes in output structure and TypeScript type definitions, including updates to import statements and type definitions.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The PR renames the imported velite config variable to avoid potential naming conflicts. The implementation changes the import name from 'config' to '__vc' in the type definitions, and updates corresponding test assertions to account for the change in string length due to the variable renaming.

Class diagram for updated import naming

classDiagram
    class Output {
        +outputEntry(dest: string, format: Output['format'], configPath: string)
    }

    class TypeDefinitions {
        -config
        +__vc
        +Collections: typeof __vc.collections
    }

    Output --> TypeDefinitions : uses

    note for TypeDefinitions "Renamed import from 'config' to '__vc' to avoid naming conflicts."
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Renamed the imported config variable in type definitions
  • Changed import name from 'config' to '__vc'
  • Updated the Collections type reference to use the new import name
src/output.ts
Updated test assertions to match new output lengths
  • Adjusted expected type definition file length from 636 to 632 bytes to account for the variable rename
test/basic.ts
test/nextjs.ts

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#248 Fix naming conflicts when a collection object is named 'config' by renaming the default import in generated types

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to type imports and references within the outputEntry function located in src/output.ts. The import statement for the type has been modified to avoid potential name conflicts, specifically changing from config to __vc. Additionally, the expected output length for TypeScript definition files in two test cases has been corrected from 636 to 632. The overall structure and logic of the functions and tests remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/output.ts Updated type import from config to __vc and modified type reference from typeof config.collections to typeof __vc.collections.
test/basic.ts Adjusted expected length of dts output from 636 to 632 in the test case.
test/nextjs.ts Adjusted expected length of dts output from 636 to 632 in the test case.
docs/guide/using-collections.md Updated documentation to reflect changes in type imports and output structure, including type definitions for Collections, Post, and Other.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Prevent name conflicts in generated types when a collection is called config (#248)

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: support format config #238: This PR modifies the outputEntry function in src/output.ts, adding a new format parameter, which is related to the type reference changes made in this PR.

🐇 In the code we play,
Types are here to stay!
No more conflicts found,
In the output, we’re sound.
With lengths now aligned,
Our types are well-defined! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @zce - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/basic.ts (1)

Line range hint 1-31: Consider adding a test case for the naming conflict scenario.

While this test verifies the build output integrity, it would be valuable to add a specific test case that ensures the naming conflict (issue #248) is properly prevented. This would help prevent regression and document the expected behavior.

Would you like me to help create a test case that verifies the proper handling of collections named 'config'?

src/output.ts (1)

40-41: Consider documenting the naming convention.

While the fix is correct, it would be helpful to document why __vc was chosen as the import name, either in the code or in the project's documentation, to prevent future confusion.

Consider adding a comment explaining the naming convention:

+// Using __vc prefix to avoid conflicts with collection names
 const dts: string[] = [`import type __vc from '${configModPath}'\n`]
 dts.push('type Collections = typeof __vc.collections\n')
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d67422 and dc6c6b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/output.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/basic.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/nextjs.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/basic.ts (1)

15-15: LGTM! The updated length reflects the import rename.

The reduction in length from 636 to 632 (4 characters) aligns perfectly with the change from 'config' to '__vc' in the type imports.

test/nextjs.ts (1)

14-14: LGTM! The updated length assertion correctly reflects the import rename change.

The reduction in expected length (636 -> 632) aligns with the PR's objective of renaming the import from 'config' to '__vc'.

Let's verify the consistency with basic.ts test:

✅ Verification successful

✓ Length assertion is consistent across test files

The expected length of 632 is correctly synchronized between both test/nextjs.ts and test/basic.ts, confirming the consistent behavior of the import rename change.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that both test files have the same expected length for dts output

# Test: Check if basic.ts has the same expected length
rg "dts.length, 632" test/basic.ts

Length of output: 96

Comment on lines +40 to +41
const dts: string[] = [`import type __vc from '${configModPath}'\n`]
dts.push('type Collections = typeof __vc.collections\n')
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

The rename from config to __vc is correctly implemented in the source code

The only remaining reference to import config from '../velite.config' is in the documentation example which needs to be updated to reflect the new changes. The actual implementation in the source code has been properly updated to use __vc to prevent naming conflicts.

  • Documentation needs update in docs/guide/using-collections.md to reflect the new import name
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! The rename effectively addresses the naming conflict.

The change from config to __vc for the type import prevents potential naming conflicts when collections are named config, addressing issue #248.

Let's verify that this change effectively prevents the naming conflict:


Let me gather more information to verify if the remaining reference is just in documentation or if there are any actual code references we need to address.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the fix prevents naming conflicts with 'config' collection

# Test 1: Check if there are any remaining references to the old import name
rg "import.*config.*from.*velite\.config" 

# Test 2: Verify the generated declaration file structure
ast-grep --pattern $'import type __vc from'

Length of output: 158


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other references to 'config' imports in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg -t ts -t js "import.*config.*from.*velite\.config"

# Check the actual content of the docs file to understand the context
cat "docs/guide/using-collections.md"

# Look for any type declarations using 'config'
ast-grep --pattern $'type $_ = typeof config'

Length of output: 6145

@zce zce merged commit 146a4d8 into main Oct 31, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@zce zce deleted the fix-248 branch October 31, 2024 01:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Name conflicts happen in the generated types if a collection object is called config
1 participant