Add support for rust cfg response file #2
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add support to write the rustc_cfg response file via write_rustcfg. This is equivalent to the rust response file used for rust support in the kernel as introduced in 2f7ab1267dc9b2d1f29695aff3211c87483480f3 in the kernel tree. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20220212130410.6901-17-ojeda@kernel.org/#Z31scripts:kconfig:confdata.c
|
Rebased |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support to write the rustc_cfg response file via write_rustcfg. This is equivalent to the rust response file used for rust support in the kernel as introduced in
2f7ab1267dc9b2d1f29695aff3211c87483480f3 in the kernel tree.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20220212130410.6901-17-ojeda@kernel.org/#Z31scripts:kconfig:confdata.c
This implements the response file generator as mentioned in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr#65837 (comment)