-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add rank animals report for 12 Katahdin sheep sorted by WWT #8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
c76732f
fc4f37f
a26b960
99c4523
3ea4b46
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
| rank,lpn_id,gender,dob,score,BWT_value,BWT_accuracy,BWT_contribution,WWT_value,WWT_accuracy,WWT_contribution,YWT_value,YWT_accuracy,YWT_contribution,PWWT_value,PWWT_accuracy,PWWT_contribution,NLB_value,NLB_accuracy,NLB_contribution | ||
| 1,6401492025FLE087,Female,3/2/2025,11.91,0.354,63,-0.223,3.072,61,3.748,5.728,53,4.554,5.888,64,3.768,0.133,44,0.059 | ||
| 2,6401492020FLE249,Female,2/5/2020,11.05,0.244,74,-0.181,3.051,71,4.332,3.625,63,3.426,4.659,73,3.401,0.118,58,0.068 | ||
| 3,6401492025FLE047,Female,2/24/2025,9.90,0.432,59,-0.255,2.951,57,3.364,5.056,49,3.716,5.094,60,3.056,0.042,36,0.015 | ||
| 4,6401492025FLE024,Female,2/20/2025,9.44,0.473,60,-0.284,2.842,58,3.297,4.615,49,3.392,4.990,60,2.994,0.126,36,0.045 | ||
| 5,6401492025FLE008,Female,2/16/2025,8.98,0.169,62,-0.105,2.726,61,3.326,3.593,53,2.856,4.490,63,2.829,0.164,44,0.072 | ||
| 6,6401492025FLE082,Female,2/28/2025,9.99,0.334,65,-0.217,2.702,63,3.405,4.410,55,3.638,4.796,65,3.117,0.113,45,0.051 | ||
| 7,6401492025FLE011,Female,2/17/2025,6.49,0.001,61,-0.001,2.193,59,2.588,2.191,52,1.709,3.460,61,2.111,0.175,45,0.079 | ||
| 8,6401492025FLE029,Female,2/21/2025,7.31,0.177,58,-0.103,2.129,56,2.384,3.581,49,2.632,3.976,59,2.346,0.112,41,0.046 | ||
| 9,6401492023FLE078,Female,2/21/2023,3.30,0.306,64,-0.196,1.620,62,2.009,0.677,52,0.528,1.615,61,0.985,-0.052,50,-0.026 | ||
| 10,6401492025FLE141,Male,2/24/2025,4.33,0.264,61,-0.161,1.269,59,1.497,2.208,47,1.557,2.490,58,1.444,-0.016,38,-0.006 | ||
| 11,6402382024NCS310,Male,2/13/2024,4.37,-0.235,80,0.188,1.214,78,1.894,0.796,68,0.812,1.764,81,1.429,0.092,55,0.051 | ||
| 12,6401492022FLE002,Female,1/23/2022,-1.56,-0.176,66,0.116,-0.014,64,-0.018,-1.324,55,-1.092,-0.900,66,-0.594,0.060,50,0.030 |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,289 @@ | ||||||
| # Rank Animals Report — Weighted Trait Index | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Closes #5 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Date**: February 16, 2026 | ||||||
| **Action**: Rank Animals — Weighted Trait Index Ranking | ||||||
| **Breed**: Katahdin | ||||||
| **Animals Analyzed**: 12 | ||||||
| **Database Last Updated**: February 13, 2026 | ||||||
| **Sort Criterion**: WWT (Weaning Weight) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Summary | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| This report ranks 12 Katahdin sheep from Beyond Blessed Farm and North Carolina State University using a weighted trait index, sorted by weaning weight (WWT) as specified. Since no specific trait weights were provided, we used a balanced weighting scheme suitable for hair sheep: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - **BWT** (Birth Weight): -1.0 — Lower birth weight is preferred to reduce birthing difficulties | ||||||
| - **WWT** (Weaning Weight): 2.0 — Higher weaning weight indicates faster early growth | ||||||
| - **YWT** (Yearling Weight): 1.5 — Higher yearling weight for market lamb production | ||||||
| - **PWWT** (Post-Weaning Weight): 1.0 — Growth after weaning | ||||||
| - **NLB** (Number of Lambs Born): 1.0 — Fertility trait for maternal ability | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Score Formula**: `Score = Σ(trait_value × weight × accuracy / 100)` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The collection includes 10 females and 2 males. Most animals are young (born in 2025), with 6402382024NCS310 being a proven sire with 25 progeny and higher accuracy values. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Rankings (Sorted by WWT) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Rank | LPN ID | Gender | WWT | Score | Key Strengths | | ||||||
| |------|--------|--------|-----|-------|---------------| | ||||||
| | 1 | 6401492025FLE087 | Female | +3.07 | 11.91 | Highest WWT, High YWT, High PWWT | | ||||||
| | 2 | 6401492020FLE249 | Female | +3.05 | 11.05 | High WWT, proven dam (6 progeny) | | ||||||
| | 3 | 6401492025FLE047 | Female | +2.95 | 9.90 | High WWT, High YWT | | ||||||
| | 4 | 6401492025FLE024 | Female | +2.84 | 9.44 | High WWT, High YWT | | ||||||
| | 5 | 6401492025FLE008 | Female | +2.73 | 8.98 | High WWT, High NLB | | ||||||
| | 6 | 6401492025FLE082 | Female | +2.70 | 9.99 | High WWT, High YWT | | ||||||
| | 7 | 6401492025FLE011 | Female | +2.19 | 6.49 | High NLB | | ||||||
| | 8 | 6401492025FLE029 | Female | +2.13 | 7.31 | Balanced traits | | ||||||
| | 9 | 6401492023FLE078 | Female | +1.62 | 3.30 | Moderate WWT | | ||||||
| | 10 | 6401492025FLE141 | Male | +1.27 | 4.33 | Moderate WWT | | ||||||
| | 11 | 6402382024NCS310 | Male | +1.21 | 4.37 | Low BWT, proven sire (25 progeny) | | ||||||
| | 12 | 6401492022FLE002 | Female | -0.01 | -1.56 | Low BWT | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Detailed Animal Profiles | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 1. 6401492025FLE087 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 3/2/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 11.91 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.35 | 63% | -0.22 | Above average (worse) (58th percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +3.07 | 61% | +3.75 | Top 25% (67th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +5.73 | 53% | +4.55 | Top 25% (77th percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +5.89 | 64% | +3.77 | Top 25% (79th percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.13 | 44% | +0.06 | Below average (47th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Highest weaning weight in the group with excellent growth across all weight traits. Strong yearling weight for market production. Birth weight is above average which may require monitoring for ease of lambing. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 2. 6401492020FLE249 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/5/2020 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 11.05 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.24 | 74% | -0.18 | Above average (worse) (53rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +3.05 | 71% | +4.33 | Top 25% (67th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +3.63 | 63% | +3.43 | Above average (66th percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +4.66 | 73% | +3.40 | Above average (71st percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.12 | 58% | +0.07 | Below average (46th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Excellent weaning weight with proven production (6 progeny). High accuracies due to age and progeny data. Reliable breeding animal with consistent growth traits. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 3. 6401492025FLE047 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/24/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 9.90 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.43 | 59% | -0.26 | Above average (worse) (61st percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +2.95 | 57% | +3.36 | Above average (65th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +5.06 | 49% | +3.72 | Top 25% (73rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +5.09 | 60% | +3.06 | Top 25% (74th percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.04 | 36% | +0.02 | Below average (38th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Strong growth profile with excellent yearling weight. Birth weight is higher than average — consider mating with low BWT sires. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 4. 6401492025FLE024 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/20/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 9.44 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.47 | 60% | -0.28 | Above average (worse) (63rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +2.84 | 58% | +3.30 | Above average (64th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +4.62 | 49% | +3.39 | Above average (71st percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +4.99 | 60% | +2.99 | Above average (73rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.13 | 36% | +0.05 | Below average (47th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Good growth traits across the board. Birth weight is on the higher side which could affect ease of lambing. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 5. 6401492025FLE008 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/16/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 8.98 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.17 | 62% | -0.11 | Near average (53rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +2.73 | 61% | +3.33 | Above average (63rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +3.59 | 53% | +2.86 | Above average (66th percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +4.49 | 63% | +2.83 | Above average (70th percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.16 | 44% | +0.07 | Above average (50th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Well-balanced growth profile with better birth weight than many in the group. Good fertility indicator with above-average NLB. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 6. 6401492025FLE082 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/28/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 9.99 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.33 | 65% | -0.22 | Above average (worse) (57th percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +2.70 | 63% | +3.41 | Above average (63rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +4.41 | 55% | +3.64 | Above average (70th percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +4.80 | 65% | +3.12 | Above average (72nd percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.11 | 45% | +0.05 | Below average (45th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Strong growth characteristics with good weaning and yearling weights. Despite ranking 6th by WWT, has second-highest composite score (9.99) due to excellent YWT and PWWT. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 7. 6401492025FLE011 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/17/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 6.49 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.00 | 61% | -0.00 | Average (50th percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +2.19 | 59% | +2.59 | Above average (57th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +2.19 | 52% | +1.71 | Above average (59th percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +3.46 | 61% | +2.11 | Above average (65th percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.18 | 45% | +0.08 | Above average (51st percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Best fertility indicator in the group (NLB +0.18). Birth weight right at breed average. Sired by proven ram NCS310. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 8. 6401492025FLE029 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/21/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 7.31 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.18 | 58% | -0.10 | Near average (53rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +2.13 | 56% | +2.38 | Above average (56th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +3.58 | 49% | +2.63 | Above average (66th percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +3.98 | 59% | +2.35 | Above average (68th percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.11 | 41% | +0.05 | Below average (45th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Balanced growth profile with good yearling weight. Also sired by proven ram NCS310. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 9. 6401492023FLE078 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Female | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/21/2023 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 3.30 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.31 | 64% | -0.20 | Above average (worse) (56th percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +1.62 | 62% | +2.01 | Above average (51st percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +0.68 | 52% | +0.53 | Above average (51st percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +1.62 | 61% | +0.99 | Above average (53rd percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | -0.05 | 50% | -0.03 | Below average (29th percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Older animal (2023) with moderate traits across the board. Below-average fertility indicator. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 10. 6401492025FLE141 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Male | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/24/2025 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 4.33 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | +0.26 | 61% | -0.16 | Above average (worse) (54th percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +1.27 | 59% | +1.50 | Below average (47th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +2.21 | 47% | +1.56 | Above average (59th percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +2.49 | 58% | +1.44 | Above average (59th percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | -0.02 | 38% | -0.01 | Below average (33rd percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Young ram with below-average weaning weight but improving at yearling stage. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ### 11. 6402382024NCS310 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Gender**: Male | ||||||
| **Date of Birth**: 2/13/2024 | ||||||
| **Overall Score**: 4.37 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| | Trait | Value | Accuracy | Contribution to Score | Breed Position | | ||||||
| |-------|-------|----------|----------------------|----------------| | ||||||
| | BWT | -0.24 | 80% | +0.19 | Below average (better) (32nd percentile) | | ||||||
| | WWT | +1.21 | 78% | +1.89 | Below average (46th percentile) | | ||||||
| | YWT | +0.80 | 68% | +0.81 | Above average (52nd percentile) | | ||||||
| | PWWT | +1.76 | 81% | +1.43 | Above average (54th percentile) | | ||||||
| | NLB | +0.09 | 55% | +0.05 | Below average (43rd percentile) | | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Proven sire with 25 progeny and excellent accuracy values (68-81%). Negative birth weight is highly desirable — reduces lambing difficulty. Despite ranking 11th by WWT, the high accuracies and low BWT make this ram a reliable breeding option. Already sire to three ewes in this group (FLE011, FLE029, FLE008). | ||||||
|
||||||
| **Analysis**: Proven sire with 25 progeny and excellent accuracy values (68-81%). Negative birth weight is highly desirable — reduces lambing difficulty. Despite ranking 11th by WWT, the high accuracies and low BWT make this ram a reliable breeding option. Already sire to three ewes in this group (FLE011, FLE029, FLE008). | |
| **Analysis**: Proven sire with 25 progeny and excellent accuracy values (68-81%). Negative birth weight is highly desirable — reduces lambing difficulty. Despite ranking 11th by WWT, the high accuracies and low BWT make this ram a reliable breeding option. Already sire to two ewes in this group (FLE011, FLE029). |
Copilot
AI
Feb 18, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The statement "These ewes produce fast-growing lambs ideal for market" is misleading because two of the three ewes mentioned (FLE087 and FLE047) were born in early 2025 and are too young to have produced any lambs yet. The recommendation should be rephrased to reflect that their high WWT EBVs predict they will produce fast-growing lambs, rather than stating it as an accomplished fact. For example: "These ewes are predicted to produce fast-growing lambs ideal for market based on their high WWT EBVs."
| 1. **Top WWT Performers** (6401492025FLE087, 6401492020FLE249, 6401492025FLE047) show excellent growth traits and should be prioritized for retention. These ewes produce fast-growing lambs ideal for market. | |
| 1. **Top WWT Performers** (6401492025FLE087, 6401492020FLE249, 6401492025FLE047) show excellent growth traits and should be prioritized for retention. These ewes are predicted to produce fast-growing lambs ideal for market based on their high WWT EBVs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The report header references "Closes #5" but the PR description indicates this PR fixes issue #7. The issue number in this header should match the actual issue number being addressed. Please update this to "Closes #7" to ensure proper issue tracking and linking.