Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

transaction request #37

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

transaction request #37

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

LeonardTibben
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tluijken tluijken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check ook nog even op un-used imports. Er zitten er links en rechts nog wel wat.

src/effects/effects_for_transaction_request.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 1987 to 1991
effects_for_liquidity_pools_response
.clone()
.unwrap()
._embedded()
.records()[0]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Het ophalen van het eerste record zou ik 1 keer doen. En dan hergebruiken over alle onderliggende asserts.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lijkt me handig om dit ook bij meerdere endpoints in een keer te doen bij dezelfde refactor

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ik zie m toch liever nu al mee in deze pr, opdat we het niet vergeten.

src/horizon_client.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/horizon_client.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tluijken tluijken deleted the effects-transaction branch September 10, 2024 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants