-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
[CDX-241] Docs: Update docs for filterName and filterValue #259
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CDX-241] Docs: Update docs for filterName and filterValue #259
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR updates documentation for filterName and filterValue parameters across the codebase to provide more accurate and detailed guidance. The changes clarify that filterName should typically be "group_id" for browsing item groups, and update example values from generic placeholders to more realistic ones.
- Replaces vague documentation with specific guidance on valid
filterNamevalues ("group_id", "collection_id", or facet names) - Updates example code snippets to use "sales" as a more realistic
filterValueinstead of "Pantry" or "russet" - Adds usage examples to help developers understand proper parameter usage
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| AutocompleteClient/FW/Logic/Worker/ConstructorIO.swift | Updated documentation for browse tracking method parameters and example code to use "sales" instead of "Pantry" |
| AutocompleteClient/FW/Logic/Request/CIOBrowseQuery.swift | Enhanced parameter documentation with detailed descriptions of valid values and added usage example with "sales" filterValue |
| AutocompleteClient/FW/Logic/Request/Builder/CIOBrowseQueryBuilder.swift | Updated initializer documentation and example code, replacing "russet" with "sales" for consistency |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
AutocompleteClient/FW/Logic/Request/Builder/CIOBrowseQueryBuilder.swift
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Code Review SummaryThis PR updates the documentation for Detailed FeedbackPositive Changes
Issues Found
ConclusionThis is a solid documentation improvement PR that significantly enhances the clarity of the Browse API parameters. The issues identified are minor and primarily related to punctuation consistency and a pre-existing typo. I recommend addressing the punctuation inconsistencies for polish, but they don't block approval. Great work on making the API more accessible to developers! ✅ Recommendation: Approve with minor suggestions for improvement. |
esezen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good. Thanks for working on this. Can we update the code example?
Code Review SummaryThis PR updates the documentation for Detailed FeedbackPositive Aspects✅ Comprehensive Documentation Updates: The PR systematically updates documentation across multiple files (CIOBrowseQuery, CIOBrowseQueryBuilder, ConstructorIO.swift, and README.md), ensuring consistency. ✅ Clear Value Guidance: The new documentation explicitly lists possible values for ✅ Improved Examples: Replacing placeholder values like "potato"/"russet" and "Pantry" with more meaningful examples like "group_id"/"sales" makes the examples more realistic and easier to understand. ✅ Context-Rich Documentation: Adding explanatory text like "Use 'group_id' by default for browsing item groups" provides valuable context about common use cases. Specific Comments[File: [File: [File: [File: [General: Documentation Formatting] Minor Suggestions
ConclusionVerdict: ✅ APPROVED This is an excellent documentation improvement PR. The changes are clear, consistent, and significantly enhance the developer experience by providing concrete guidance on how to use the browse functionality. The replacement of placeholder examples with realistic values makes the SDK more approachable for new developers. The documentation now clearly communicates:
No blocking issues found. The minor suggestions above are optional enhancements that could further improve clarity, but the PR is ready to merge as-is. Great work on improving the developer documentation! 🎉 |
Changes
CIOBrowseQuerystructCIOBrowseQueryBuilderclass