Add include mask option to the classifier and tested it

[KorenMary]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6999988) 82.07% compared to head (e37b65c) 87.60%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #66      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.07%   87.60%   +5.52%     
==========================================
  Files          16       22       +6     
  Lines         848     1452     +604     
==========================================
+ Hits          696     1272     +576     
- Misses        152      180      +28     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[christinab12]

PR looks good, but I see that utils has similar changes as Random-Forest branch, we might face a merge conflict there, let's see! Are you sure your tests take include_mask=True? The codecov report suggests otherwise?

[KorenMary]

PR looks good, but I see that utils has similar changes as Random-Forest branch, we might face a merge conflict there, let's see! Are you sure your tests take include_mask=True? The codecov report suggests otherwise?

Yes, I have double-checked in src\server\test\test_config.cfg the include-mask parameter is True. Which test is responsible for this in codecov?