Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA-15315 Backport from jcontent, clearing multiple localized props #1783

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

r3dm1ke
Copy link
Contributor

@r3dm1ke r3dm1ke commented Jan 7, 2025

JIRA

https://jira.jahia.org/browse/QA-15315

Description

Tests

The following are included in this PR

  • Unit Tests (Most changes should have unit tests)
  • Integration Tests

Checklist

I have considered the following implications of my change:

  • Security (in particular for changes to authentication, authorization, data fetching, ...)
  • Performance
  • Migration
  • Code maintainability

Documentation

  • Inline documentation
  • Internal Documentation (wiki)
  • User-facing Documentation

AKarmanov
AKarmanov previously approved these changes Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gflores-jahia gflores-jahia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably need to update our jahia-depends clause to latest graphql snapshot (without the snapshot qualifier) https://github.com/Jahia/content-editor/blob/master/pom.xml#L52

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
- 'mvn:org.jahia.modules/dx-base-demo-components/2.4.0'
- 'mvn:org.jahia.modules/digitall/2.3.0'
- 'mvn:org.jahia.modules/jcontent/2.15.0'
- 'mvn:org.jahia.modules/graphql-dxm-provider/2.22.0-SNAPSHOT'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's ok with snapshot like that I think, but if I recall correctly it should take snapshot if you just pass 2.22.0, so when it's released we don't have to modify this file gain. You can run provisioning locally to verify, it's probably a good idea to update if it works that way.

AKarmanov
AKarmanov previously approved these changes Jan 14, 2025
AKarmanov
AKarmanov previously approved these changes Jan 14, 2025
gflores-jahia
gflores-jahia previously approved these changes Jan 14, 2025
@r3dm1ke r3dm1ke merged commit b5ccacc into master Jan 14, 2025
10 checks passed
@r3dm1ke r3dm1ke deleted the QA-15315 branch January 14, 2025 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants