Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Redis backend target #111

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 8, 2024
Merged

feat: Redis backend target #111

merged 6 commits into from
Sep 8, 2024

Conversation

epociask
Copy link
Collaborator

@epociask epociask commented Sep 4, 2024

Fixes Issue

Fixes #

Changes proposed

Screenshots (Optional)

Note to reviewers

server/config.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/config.go Show resolved Hide resolved
store/redis.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/server.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
server/config.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/load_store.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/load_store.go Show resolved Hide resolved
store/redis.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
store/redis.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
e2e/server_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
store/redis.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/server.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/load_store.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/load_store.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/config.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@epociask epociask requested a review from samlaf September 5, 2024 20:57
Copy link
Collaborator

@samlaf samlaf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good on my side, but haven't looked at latest and other discussions going on.

@epociask epociask merged commit ea2ef51 into main Sep 8, 2024
7 checks passed
@epociask epociask deleted the epociask--feat-redis branch September 8, 2024 22:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants