Manual retirement of @grahamc #70
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a manual PR to retire @grahamc as a Nixpkgs committer because they have not used their commit access* in the past year.
@grahamc: You can make a comment stating why you believe your commit access should be kept. Otherwise, I suggest this PR to be merged and implemented in one month.
Note
Commit access is not required for most forms of contributing, including being a maintainer and reviewing PRs. It is only needed for things that require
writepermissions to Nixpkgs, such as merging PRs.* I created this PR manually, because the automated script looks at all kinds of commit access, not only "merging PRs". @grahamc did not merge any PR last year - however he did accidentally push a branch to the nixpkgs repo instead of his fork and then deleted it again one day later. This makes the automation ignore him for retirement. However, the spirit of RFC 55 (which he co-authored!) is still kept.